Search results

  1. Petrodus

    Arg! Et tu, National Geographic

    Tried to view the article and comments and got a pop-up Please register or sign in to continue Edit I clicked on "Register Later" then could see the article
  2. Petrodus

    Wikipedia - Electronic cigarette

    Wikipedia should not in anyway be a platform for those opposed to e-cigarettes. That includes the garbage lies that e-smoking MIGHT not be as dangerous as smoking and the benefits haven't been proven. Edits should be made by those with the facts and I suggest edits should be written by or at...
  3. Petrodus

    Arg! Et tu, National Geographic

    There was a time BEFORE "Reality TV" when National Geographic produced high quality programs. Now its hard to find any program on Cable TV which is not a "Reality TV" show.
  4. Petrodus

    Wikipedia - Electronic cigarette

    Wikipedia is a MAJOR reference site maybe someone in CASAA who is familiar with editing Wikipedia could step up and edit this to insure the text is accurate.
  5. Petrodus

    Arg! Et tu, National Geographic

    We should "hammer" National Geographic for publishing this garbage ... in the comments section
  6. Petrodus

    Oh no! This author thinks we're uncool!

  7. Petrodus

    Arg! Et tu, National Geographic

    I was also surprised to see National Geographic "Sell Out" !!
  8. Petrodus

    Arg! Et tu, National Geographic

    Are E-Cigarettes a Boon, a Menace or Both? ... articles are being reprinted around the Net.
  9. Petrodus

    Don't oppose e-cigarettes because they're safer

    SCREAMS ... The FDA is opposed to Tobacco Harm Reduction and is an open door to the FDA's position on ecigs ... more like an open garage door !!
  10. Petrodus

    60 Millions de consommateurs: inventing new laws in mathematics, having no idea about e-cigarettes

    We need to choke the comments section with tons of congratulations and thankful comments. The doctor is sticking his neck out to tell the truth and condemn all those who lie ... he should know that he has our support and appreciation. Network the article in our social media and ask others...
  11. Petrodus

    Wikipedia - Electronic cigarette

    Wikipedia - Electronic cigarette What kind of Politically Correct B.S. is this ??
  12. Petrodus

    60 Millions de consommateurs: inventing new laws in mathematics, having no idea about e-cigarettes

  13. Petrodus

    Philip Moris ecig to be released in 2016 - current models "taste bad", don't deliver reliable nic dose

    I'm sure BT and the FDA have been playing golf together. What I find interesting is there hasn't been any FDA or BT credible specific leaks regarding the FDA's proposed regulations. Maybe the FDA is delaying simply because they really don't want to poke the Ecig hornet's nest.
  14. Petrodus

    Don't oppose e-cigarettes because they're safer

  15. Petrodus

    How many people have you seen vaping in public (if any)?

    Not easy to spot someone "Stealth" vaping unless you are looking for vapers and very close to them. If you're at distance (outdoors) ... Ya can't tell the difference between a cigarette and an ecig ... especially if it's white
  16. Petrodus

    " E-cigarette new product with same old strategy - sell addiction "

  17. Petrodus

    Mostly positive CNN article today

    Click
  18. Petrodus

    Nigel Farage on E-cigs.

    This video is just 1 small example of why I believe those opposing e-cigarettes ... have poked the wrong hornet's nest !!
  19. Petrodus

    Nigel Farage on E-cigs.

    Same video ... but starts with the e-cigarette segment Click Here :)
  20. Petrodus

    It's a choice not a right.

    I remember a similar thread in this forum Drop the Entitled Attitude For me ... Vaping is a choice
Top Bottom
Forums
Products
Vaping.com
Star Suppliers
Blogs
Menu