60 Millions de consommateurs: inventing new laws in mathematics, having no idea about e-cigarettes

[JColt]

Another good article.

60 Millions de consommateurs: inventing new laws in mathematics, having no idea about e-cigarettes

 

[Petrodus]

I believe it is my ethical duty to properly inform the public about this sensitive issue. And it is a duty to severely criticize and discredit “studies” that are used in an unethical game of publicity and produce nothing more than misinformation and intimidation. People who are playing with the health and lives of smokers deserve to be publicly condemned for their actions.

 

[xpl0it]

Someone give the doc a Nobel Peace Prize!!

 

[Petrodus]

We need to choke the comments section with tons of congratulations
and thankful comments. The doctor is sticking his neck out to tell the truth
and condemn all those who lie ... he should know that he has our support
and appreciation.

Network the article in our social media and ask others to post positive comments.

The doctor is looking for comments from the public ... If we don't pat him on the back,
you can bet your bottom dollar the ANTZ and all those opposed to ecigs will take shots at him.

 

[Anjaffm]

Thank you
this issue has also been posted here:
http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/fo...tudy-help-french-vapers-demand-apologies.html

I bet Dr. Farsalinos will be grateful for positive comments. I gave him one already
He is one of the honest scientists who does not join the chorus of bought (?) "scientists" who spread fear, uncertainty and doubt about e-cigs. That guy rocks!

And here is another posting by Dr. Farsalinos about the same issue:
http://ecigarette-research.com/web/...ence-principles-60-millions-de-consommateurs3

excerpt:

In an update of their article, they provide an answer to my previous comment by “clarifying” that their conclusion was that certain e-cigarettes may be more toxic that certain tobacco cigarettes. This conclusion, as I have already mentioned in my previous analysis, can be made only if you select the best result from a tobacco cigarette with the worst result from an electronic cigarette. However, they still fail to understand that this is incompatible with basic principles of science and research.

 

[LaraC]

We need to choke the comments section with tons of congratulations
and thankful comments. The doctor is sticking his neck out to tell the truth
and condemn all those who lie ... he should know that he has our support
and appreciation.

Network the article in our social media and ask others to post positive comments.

The doctor is looking for comments from the public ... If we don't pat him on the back,
you can bet your bottom dollar the ANTZ and all those opposed to ecigs will take shots at him.

You're right, Petrodus. Dr. Farsalinos deserves all the support we can give him. I posted this comment:
Thank you, Dr. Farsalinos, for having the integrity, intelligence, and courage to shine a light of rational, scientific thinking on that travesty of a "study."

 

[Uma]

Bumping ...


the abbreviation for "for the win" was censored out.
Off to google what else it stands for

and sometimes, of course, depending on my mood,

 

[oplholik]

I added a comment also. Boy, do we need more like him.