Advisory warning to be placed on all sites.

Status
Not open for further replies.

pillbox38

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Just as a heads up we are initiating step 1 of dealing with the MLX NCP consulatation by adding this footer on all pages all sites. Any other distributor feel free to use it. Off course if your applying for an MA from the MHRA you wont need to.

WARNING: the electronic cigarette will not cure a smokers addiction to nicotine, the electronic cigarette serves the same purpose as a tobacco cigarette- it delivers its user nicotine. If you do suffer from the disease of tobacco/Nicotine Dependence Syndrome and want to take steps to give up smoking or cut down the quantity of cigarettes you currently smoke. We recommend you visit your health care provider to discuss NRT (Nicotine Replacement Therapy) or a nicotine harm reduction programme.

Please Note: We are not a pharmaceutical company and we do not produce medical products.

We are also in the process of finalising details that we believe have a rock solid chance of allowing all sellers to be selling their NCPs for recreational purposes, to still be selling un hindered after JUNE the 21st.

Sellers going for a medical license we agree should be banned from selling till their approval is received.

IE we agree to option 1 for all companies claiming medicinal purpose for their products.

So if i achieve what i expect only sellers who will be banned from selling will be companies that believe their products are medicinal the rest of us will be ok.

Lots of work to do but im happy i have a soloution..
 
Last edited:

pillbox38

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
We must remember that the MHRA deal with the disease of tobacco addiction not the fun of recreation.

Therefore Option 1 is a must for unlicensed medicinal NCPs.

IE any company who want their products used for NRT or harm reduction, then i agree it would be totally un-ethical for them to even consider selling to susceptible buyers who suffer from TDC (tobacco dependance Syndrome) in this we agree 100% with the MHRA.

I have received good legal counsel that because we are selling Electronic NCPs (recreational) and not Electronic NCPs (medicinal) like intelicig.

This will allow us to propose an ammendment to option 1...So fingers crossed Medicinal NCPs will be banned on the 1st June till their license is approved.

Recreational NCP sellers will then not be under the MHRAs remit. That is how it should be.

Off course i will work with the MHRA to make sure any diseased person entering my sites are directed to nicorette or relevant NRT or quit smoking help lines..
 
Last edited:

voltaire

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 4, 2009
762
7
Florida
May I make the suggestion that you stop referring to ecigs as ENI's? That just sounds too medical/clinical to me. If not just ecigs or PV's, how about SRND (Safer Recreational Nicotine Device) or something along those lines? (since that doesn't quite roll off the tongue)

Edit: Or how about you just add Recreational to ENI, giving you ERNI. (but the "inhaler" part still remains)
 
Last edited:

Brewster 59

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 22, 2009
1,035
1
North Bay San Francisco
May I make the suggestion that you stop referring to ecigs as ENI's? That just sounds too medical/clinical to me. If not just ecigs or PV's, how about SRND (Safer Recreational Nicotine Device) or something along those lines? (since that doesn't quite roll off the tongue)

Why, I actually think ENI sounds cool and is so easy to say, It does sound medical and really I only use it when trying to vape in public places, but its funny when I tell bartenders this or waitress they assume it is some kind of prescribed devise and all of a sudden its ok to use it there.
 

voltaire

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 4, 2009
762
7
Florida
Why, I actually think ENI sounds cool and is so easy to say, It does sound medical and really I only use it when trying to vape in public places, but its funny when I tell bartenders this or waitress they assume it is some kind of prescribed devise and all of a sudden its ok to use it there.
Well, because the image you describe is exactly the image that the OP is attempting to distance himself from.
 

River

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Nov 11, 2009
591
36
Independence, KY USA
We must remember that the MHRA deal with the disease of tobacco addiction not the fun of recreation.

Therefore Option 1 is a must for unlicensed medicinal NCPs.

IE any company who want their products used for NRT or harm reduction, then i agree it would be totally un-ethical for them to even consider selling to susceptible buyers who suffer from TDC (tobacco dependance Syndrome) in this we agree 100% with the MHRA.

I have received good legal counsel that because we are selling Electronic NCPs (recreational) and not Electronic NCPs (medicinal) like intelicig.

This will allow us to propose an ammendment to option 1...So fingers crossed Medicinal NCPs will be banned on the 1st June till their license is approved.

Recreational NCP sellers will then not be under the MHRAs remit. That is how it should be.

Off course i will work with the MHRA to make sure any diseased person entering my sites are directed to nicorette or relevant NRT or quit smoking help lines..
this is me chuckling like an idiot at "any diseased person entering my sites" har har har!
 

Red Dog

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 14, 2009
346
94
Massachusetts
www.facebook.com
May I make the suggestion that you stop referring to ecigs as ENI's? That just sounds too medical/clinical to me. If not just ecigs or PV's, how about SRND (Safer Recreational Nicotine Device) or something along those lines? (since that doesn't quite roll off the tongue)

Edit: Or how about you just add Recreational to ENI, giving you ERNI. (but the "inhaler" part still remains)

I seem to recall reading that they started calling them ENI's at the suggestion of the FDA, or some lawyer. Or maybe I just imagined it all... :confused:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread