Atomizer on top of the tank

Status
Not open for further replies.

ignotus

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Nov 26, 2014
317
255
Texas
Well, the disadvantage of that and every top-coil system is that liquid has to climb up the wick against gravity to reach the coil, more and more so as the tank is depleted.

Truly bottom-coil atomizers (like the Rose v2) get a consistent feed until the tank is empty, use shorter wicks that minimize the travel of e-liquid to the coil, and ease that travel by situating the wicks horizontally from coil to tank.

The most interesting system I've seen is that of the Taifun GS, which is the exact opposite of the one in the video: the atomizer is beneath the tank, so the e-liquid actually travels down the wick to the coil.
 
Last edited:

WattWick

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Feb 16, 2013
3,593
5,429
Cold Norway
Well, the disadvantage of that and every top-coil system is that liquid has to climb up the wick against gravity to reach the coil, more and more so as the tank is depleted.

Truly bottom-coil atomizers (like the Rose v2) get a consistent feed until the tank is empty, use shorter wicks that minimize the travel of e-liquid to the coil, and ease that travel by situating the wicks horizontally from coil to tank.

The most interesting system I've seen is that of the Taifun GS, which is the exact opposite of the one in the video: the atomizer is beneath the tank, so the e-liquid actually travels down the wick to the coil.

Not much of a problem if you use a wick capable of doing so. It's no more gravity defying than plant life.

Capillary action

In short, the capillary action is due to the pressure of cohesion and adhesion which cause the liquid to work against gravity.

How well that works with fibrous wicks - in 4 different 'corners' of the deck - remains to be seen.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread