Bridgeless vs having one
- Thread starter EKat
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
There were a lot of people removing the bridge and wicks on there regular atomizers a year or so ago. It was something that was said to give better performance and they were not needed when bottom feeding an atomizer.
I have used both bridged and not bridged. To me there was not a whole lot of difference.
The bridge might hold some juice and make for more vapes between squonks. But I never noticed it.
I have used both bridged and not bridged. To me there was not a whole lot of difference.
The bridge might hold some juice and make for more vapes between squonks. But I never noticed it.
Bridges only exist due to the old style atomizer + cartridge combo, before cartomizers were more available. Dripping on a bridge is a pretty ....ty time.
Bridgeless is the way to go, dripping or bottom feeding.
Bridgeless is the way to go, dripping or bottom feeding.
The HH 357 is the best atomizer I have ever used.
Atomizers - HH.357 Cisco Spec Hybrid Atomizers - Avid Vaper
The Cisco Spec Aero atomizers are great too
Atomizers - AERO Cisco Spec Premium Bridgeless Atomizers - Avid Vaper
I get all of my atomizers from Avid Vapor, shipping is fast and the quality of the atomizers is very good.
However, if you go with the H 357 (22 bucks), you may as well just save for a week and get a Reomizer.
The .357 is a high maintenance atty, going with the RM2 rba would be a better choice. Cisco spec are good as well as Ikenvape attys.
High maintenance? You blow it out when you get it, drip 10 drops, let soak for 30 seconds, add 3 more drops and vape it as usual...
When flavor gets weird, soak in some crap vodka for an hour, blow it out and repeat...voila.
- Status
