Business Insider takes a deeper dive into e-cigs
- Thread starter Ardo
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
It's painfully obvious the reporter never smoked
and has little "real world" working knowledge of e-cigarettes
and probably never talked to anyone who was an e-smoker.
It's also obvious when reporters have a negative view about
e-cigarettes and try to speak as if they don't.
and has little "real world" working knowledge of e-cigarettes
and probably never talked to anyone who was an e-smoker.
It's also obvious when reporters have a negative view about
e-cigarettes and try to speak as if they don't.
TRUE !!
It's embarrassing to read comments coming from those who
don't have a clue...preaching they are authorities.
"Don't believe everything you read. Trust your gut." -Mom
Yep pretty sad "journalists" are allowed to spill words from their pen without recourse
Would be nice to see them do a little better research than any one person could do in front of a computer.
Yep pretty sad "journalists" are allowed to spill words from their pen without recourse
Would be nice to see them do a little better research than any one person could do in front of a computer.Most "so-called" articles on the Net are little more than
mini-web pages with slanted reporting written often by
those with little to no credentials and or knowledge of
the subject.
However, these so called reporters ... are good at
plagiarizing as well as copying and pasting !!
mini-web pages with slanted reporting written often by
those with little to no credentials and or knowledge of
the subject.
However, these so called reporters ... are good at
plagiarizing as well as copying and pasting !!
Most "so-called" articles on the Net are little more than
mini-web pages with slanted reporting written often by
those with little to no credentials and or knowledge of
the subject.
However, these so called reporters ... are good at
plagiarizing as well as copying and pasting !!
If you click on her name you'll find she has a BS in Biology from Notre Dame and a graduate certificate in Science Communications from University of California at Santa Cruz. In other words she full well knows how to do correct research and either chooses not to or is a full blown ANTZ and is just spreading the word according to Prue. Guess which one I think it is.
I couldn't resist and had to reply to a couple of posters on there. A lot of ignorant comments and they love their caps lock.
I am a proud Californian that rebutted some of the posts on there. Some of the more idiotic ones appeared to be one person with an agenda using multiple aliases. 38 million+ residents in this beautiful state and we all don't think alike.
Last edited:
I don't believe most people in Cali (in fact the vast majority) are part of the lunatic fringe that seems to control tobacco "science" coming from that state.
Glad you cleared that up. We do try hard to institutionalize them but they are slippery creatures indeed
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
