Can i get a clear definition on the silly rule?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Java_Az

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 29, 2010
2,071
216
Colorado
I noticed a thread was closed due to being silly. I cant find any rule that says we are not allowed to be silly. So i think a rule needs to be added stating just how silly a thread can be before getting closed. I mean is there a Zero silly rule meaning any thread being silly will be closed. Somewhat silly completely silly. I really need a definition here on the acceptable sillyness of a thread as i don't want any of my threads closed.
Thanks :p
 

USMCMom

Full Member
Jan 27, 2011
16
0
North Georgia
I know exactly what your saying. It is obvious that some palms have been greased here and it does not look right in
my opinion. If we cant voice our concerns or opinions freely, we mind as well move to a country like Cuba. I am starting to loose respect and patience.

The old sqeaky wheel gets the grease huh!!!!!!!! In this case the Free are repressed!!!!!!!
 

warlike36

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 13, 2010
2,142
652
54
Seymour,IN.
I know exactly what your saying. It is obvious that some palms have been greased here and it does not look right in
my opinion. If we cant voice our concerns or opinions freely, we mind as well move to a country like Cuba. I am starting to loose respect and patience.

The old sqeaky wheel gets the grease huh!!!!!!!! In this case the Free are repressed!!!!!!!

+1 My sentiments exactly..Im sure RS is also pleased.
 

samsmom

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Sep 29, 2010
1,205
94
North Carolina
I know exactly what your saying. It is obvious that some palms have been greased here and it does not look right in
my opinion. If we cant voice our concerns or opinions freely, we mind as well move to a country like Cuba. I am starting to loose respect and patience.

The old sqeaky wheel gets the grease huh!!!!!!!! In this case the Free are repressed!!!!!!!

Totally agreed! Looks like we know WHO runs this forum!!!!
I was just trying to pass along useful information to help my fellow vapers here. I did not mention any names and kept it clean, guess it didn't work, sorry. We got some good responses though and it got a lot of attention. I was in no way trying to make trouble, just felt obligated to let other members/vapers know what happened.
 

Sdh

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 31, 2010
10,509
17,194
U.S.
Totally agreed! Looks like we know WHO runs this forum!!!!
I was just trying to pass along useful information to help my fellow vapers here. I did not mention any names and kept it clean, guess it didn't work, sorry. We got some good responses though and it got a lot of attention. I was in no way trying to make trouble, just felt obligated to let other members/vapers know what happened.
Thanks for letting us know! I am really thinking about buying direct now and bypassing all these resellers. Or buy elsewhere!

Sorry that had to happen.
 

jj2

Moved On
ECF Veteran
May 30, 2009
196,879
212,801
Hundred Acre Wood
Totally agreed! Looks like we know WHO runs this forum!!!!
I was just trying to pass along useful information to help my fellow vapers here. I did not mention any names and kept it clean, guess it didn't work, sorry. We got some good responses though and it got a lot of attention. I was in no way trying to make trouble, just felt obligated to let other members/vapers know what happened.

You did nothing wrong. In fact you were right. It's bad enough we have to fight the forces that would do the e-cig in, but now we got someone within our ranks trying to pull a fast one.
 

OnMyWay

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 22, 2009
173
0
USA
I was following that thread and am surprised to see that it was closed.

Do suppliers have influence on what can be posted here on ECF? I don't follow ecig politics and am not a fangirl of anyone's. I really am just curious if the unnamed supplier's reach reaches this far or if the silliness was just that some decided they wouldn't order from the manufacturer anymore.
 

Crimmy

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 28, 2010
627
267
69
Gainesville, GA USA
I am sorry that you closed that thread. For one thing that thread was the most legitimate thread I have read in awhile. I just know now that the forum is run by the suppliers. man how disappointing is this to finally find out. I had a feeling but now I know.

Silly = don't talk about suppliers. even if they are un-named. they know who they are.

HOW SAD
 
Last edited:

warlike36

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 13, 2010
2,142
652
54
Seymour,IN.
I read it. Nothing wrong with the tone. It is sad it was closed.

With all due respect :

Would it not be wise to hear the moderator's reasoning before launching incendiary charges his/her way?

Mod already stated the reasoning..said we were being "silly"
 

USMCMom

Full Member
Jan 27, 2011
16
0
North Georgia
I would definitely give the Mod his day in court but the reason given was just how he put it "silly". I think we all would like a little more explination as to why it got shut down so we can be a part of the solution here. The only thing I can think of is that they were afraid the supplier (s) would be named and cause a bigger problem. Other than that it was a reasonable discussion. It is unfortunate that the said product is only available from 1 manufacturer but give it time and they will come .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread