Case Closed! Study shows No Lung damage from vaping.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ipster

Ultra Member
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Nov 8, 2012
1,066
1,977
Hawaii, SAR,HongKong (Stanley)
Case Closed | Study Shows No Lung Damage From Vaping | RegulatorWatch.com

Apologies if posted here already, I didnt see it.
This is a particularly important study because participants
were “never smoked”, eliminating overlay or hidden lung damages.
While its a somewhat small sampling, the almost four year period is
fine ammunition for ANTZ’s repeating drone, “No long term studies have been conducted”.
Please share, save, support.
Cheers.
 

vapdivrr

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 8, 2012
9,966
19,932
60
sarasota,fl
Got a link to the actual study? The article is just an interpretation of a study. Such interpretations have a history around here of being less than good.
There is a link embedded , click on "get the study"

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
 

440BB

Vaping Master
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 19, 2011
9,222
33,992
The Motor City
From the study's conclusion:
Even the heaviest EC users failed to exhibit any evidence of emerging lung injury as reflected in these physiologic, clinical or inflammatory measures. Moreover, no changes were noted in blood pressure or heart rate. Since the EC users who we studied were never smokers, potential confounding by inhalation of combustion products of tobacco were obviated.

Nothing like a long term study to reveal the truth!
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,314
1
83,837
So-Cal
Just curious. But what was the Participant Sample Size of this "Study"?

BTW - From the Attached File in the post above, this is kinda a Funny Paragraph...

"In relation to health effects reporting, it is important to acknowledge that reasons for loss to follow up may include health problems. In our study, four EC users were lost to follow-up (no shows); these individuals may have quit ECs because they experienced negative health effects associated with their use. Hence, the risk for selection bias cannot be excluded."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread