Ce4 Clearomizer vs glass, pyrex tank

Status
Not open for further replies.

char78381

New Member
Mar 27, 2014
2
1
Portland, TX
I am getting ready to switch over from the 808D to Ego 1100 batteries. I use only cinnamon based e juice and have been reading a lot of threads about how the ce4 clearomizers don't stand up well to cinnamon based e juices. So I need some suggestions. Is there a ce4 clearomizer that stands up to cinnamon. If not what tank would be best. I've looked at so many I'm confused now.

Thanks
char78381
 

BigCatDaddy

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 29, 2013
1,046
1,076
Near Austin, Texas
To save yourself some money in the future, go ahead and jump right over the Ego's. They are OK, but for just a few more bucks, you can get something that will give you a much better vape. There are many but I use and enjoy the Innokin Itaste VV3 for an out and about vape and an Innokin MVP II more for around the house. The VV3 can be had for around $30 and the MVP for around $40. The are both variable voltage and variable wattege, have a puff counter and an Ohm reader and have Ego and 510 threads to accomodate any tank. I've been running a couple of mine for almost 6 mos. now with zero problems. You are on track with the KAnger tanks, IMHO. The mini PT II is a nice little tank. If you want more juice capacity, get a PT II and an Aerotank base. Both tanks use the same coil which can be rebuilt. JMHO for what it's worth. Pay a bit more now or pay it in a month or so.
 

edyle

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 23, 2013
14,199
7,195
Port-of-Spain, Trinidad & Tobago
Thanks for the info. Right now I'm looking at the Pro Tank 2 Mini. Any other out there that I might look at?

miniprotank 2; it's not a mini version of a protank; it's really a glass version of the evod.

alternatives: theres the glass smoktech aro
there is a new glass evod out I saw recently

So far, I haven't seen any glass, ego threaded, topcoil tanks.
 

edyle

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 23, 2013
14,199
7,195
Port-of-Spain, Trinidad & Tobago
Thanks for the info. Right now I'm looking at the Pro Tank 2 Mini. Any other out there that I might look at?

I actually use the full sized protank once I discovered that the eGo bases I have from the miniprotanks also fit on the miniprotank; I just have to add a second silicone cap inverted on the spire of the atomizer to seal the space above it to the center tube.

302467d1391538435-hello-everyone-img_20140204_141115.jpg
 
Being that CE4's and many other tanks are made of acrylic, by product of plastic, this may happen more times than vape/ecig stores would like to admit. Acrylic is a porous material that semi-absorbs it's contents.
Ex: I had a T3s by KangerTech filled with Mountain Dew juice and I forgot about it for the entire summer. I went back to clean it out and use a different flavor and it still smelled like Mountain Dew. So I washed it about five times and decided to soak it. I soaked it for two days and the water smelled like Mountain Dew. That spoke volumes to me, how easily can I even disinfect these things? Gross.

So from that point on I only use pyrex glass and stainless steel RDA & dripper atomizers. Clean and the flavor is significantly better. Make the switch not just for the sake of flavor but for the sanitary purposes.

Anjel
Store Manager
Infinite Vapor
 

edyle

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 23, 2013
14,199
7,195
Port-of-Spain, Trinidad & Tobago
I use a RGM2 Bottom Coil Clearomizer (2.0mL) from Fasttech for my cinnamon juice only $3.32 for a glass tank and unlike the iClear16 and evod clearos I haven't had any leaking issues. I've actually got two of them, with more on the way.

oo00oo Nice find!!

1535302-1.jpg

RGM2 Bottom Coil Clearomizer (2.0mL)glass tank / 2.2ohm
$3.32
Material Glass(Tank) + Chromed Brass
Connection Threading eGo
Replacement Heating Cores SKU 1425902 SKU 1479301 SKU 1476404 SKU 1479302 SKU 1479303
Package Contents 1*RGM2 Clearomizer
Depth 14.6 mm
Height 69.5 mm
Width 14.6 mm
Liquid Volume 2.0 ml
Product Weight 27 g
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread