Trump can save lives by rethinking vaping regulations
Good article with one exception. Sanders is not anti-vape (as some are choosing to paint him). And vapers are better served when all candidates are supportive. We need to educate Sanders on tobacco harm reduction.
With vaping conclusively proven to be 95 percent less harmful than smoking and twice as effective as any other nicotine replacement products, it is hardly surprising that millions of Americans care deeply about being denied the products saving their lives.
According to the most comprehensive peer-reviewed research on the subject, nearly 7 million lives would be saved if a majority of smokers quit smoking through the use of e-cigarettes over the next 10 years. As such, efforts by the federal government to reduce access to these life-saving products undermine public health and will doubtlessly cause more people to smoke combustible tobacco. And worse, ill-advised regulations will cause millions to take up illegal bootleg products responsible for scores of illnesses.
But ex-smokers have had to deal with wave after wave of wildly inaccurate moral panics breathlessly spread by assorted special interest groups. “Public health” groups have irresponsibly blamed vaping for a recent, tragic outbreak of lung illnesses.
Good article with one exception. Sanders is not anti-vape (as some are choosing to paint him). And vapers are better served when all candidates are supportive. We need to educate Sanders on tobacco harm reduction.