E-cigarette use reduces cancer risk

Status
Not open for further replies.

TropicalBob

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jan 13, 2008
5,623
65
Port Charlotte, FL USA
This is the world's only e-smoking researcher speaking. Good article, but this one paragraph will drive our "I cut down" friends bonkers:

100% altogether-quitting or 100% quitting by 100% switching to e-cigarette is required. Anyone continuing to smoke even one cigarette per day along with e-cigarettes (dual smoking) increases risk of premature death by about half.
 

Vocalek

CASAA Activist
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
This is the world's only e-smoking researcher speaking. Good article, but this one paragraph will drive our "I cut down" friends bonkers:

That bothered me too. It's worded in such a way that it sounds as using both is more harmful than continuing with 100% smoking, and that just does not make any sense. Let's ask Dr. Phillips about this. I think something is off in the math.

But look on the bright side, Bob. Most people don't get much beyond the headline, and the headline is good. If they do get beyond the headline, they often only read the first paragraph or too. The troublesome statement is at the very end.
 

rothenbj

Vaping Master
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 23, 2009
8,285
7,707
Green Lane, Pa
That bothered me too. It's worded in such a way that it sounds as using both is more harmful than continuing with 100% smoking, and that just does not make any sense. Let's ask Dr. Phillips about this. I think something is off in the math.

But look on the bright side, Bob. Most people don't get much beyond the headline, and the headline is good. If they do get beyond the headline, they often only read the first paragraph or too. The troublesome statement is at the very end.

What bothers me more about the statement was that it was based on a Norwegian study completed in 2002, before e figs were even a product. I could understand if they said using nicotine and smoking. However they used e cigs. It doesn't seem logical, but what do I know.
 

yvilla

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 18, 2008
2,063
575
Rochester, NY
That bothered me too. It's worded in such a way that it sounds as using both is more harmful than continuing with 100% smoking, and that just does not make any sense. Let's ask Dr. Phillips about this. I think something is off in the math.

But look on the bright side, Bob. Most people don't get much beyond the headline, and the headline is good. If they do get beyond the headline, they often only read the first paragraph or too. The troublesome statement is at the very end.

I could be wrong, Elaine, but I'm pretty sure it does not mean the use of both increases the health risk of just smoking cigarettes. I think it means that even using just that one cigarette increases the health risk as opposed to not smoking at all.
 
Last edited:
The way I read it is that smoking even just one cigarette a day increases your chance of health problems by 50%. Considering that at least one study cited was published before e-cigs were invented, I don't think this is any reference to e-cigs but rather reinforcing the idea that just cutting down is not enough to gain the health benefits of quitting smoking.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread