I get burnt taste when atty is dry.
One solution: Direct drip 2 drops on atty. Take about 13 hits. Repeat.
One solution: Direct drip 2 drops on atty. Take about 13 hits. Repeat.
Get a 2 piece (KR808D-1), so much less frustrating, huge difference.
I have heard some others complain of this also. I read here that some people think it is the fibers under the atty bridge. Some recommend removing them and others say that it will kill the atty. Just wanted to let you know what I heard.
This is only my 3rd day vaping, and I was having a few issues with my atomizers, being the tinkerer I am I decided to dig into my atty some and saw that the fibers under the bridge looked burnt, so I dug them out of one of my attys to see what would happen.
After removing them it still hit just fine and it got rid of the burning flavor I was experiencing. Everything still seems to be working fine if not better than it was before.
Why are those fibers there, they were seriously charred on one end and had to be the source of the burnt taste I was getting.
Hmmmm, weird. Maybe they were just parts of fibers that had been burnt. The atomizer I did this to still seems to be working fine, I'm sitting here vaping on it as I type this (I've finally learned how to get AMAZING throat hits off my 510, as a matter of fact, the last one made me light-headed!).Those fibers wick the juice off cart filler. No fibers means the liquid from your cart wont be getting on to the coil in the atty.
Every once in a while I soak my attys in alcohol overnite and let them dry for a day or so.This helps to get rid of any gunk on the coil and cleans the atty overall.
attys work almost like brand new after that.
Actually.. the fibers on the 510 are the "supplemental" wick. They deliver EXTRA liquid to the coil. If you remove them you end up with an atty that is much like a 901 and other models. It will work.. but it typically won't give you the clouds of vapor that you can get with a stock 510 atty.
Less vapor production: I won't argue that, though its still sufficient
poor quality control: compared to all the other Chinese made hardware, probably on par.
massive inconsistency from carto to carto: massive? really? hmm..
inhaling burnt and melting poly: about as tasty as plastic and/or the dry metal of an atty.
And thank you for being-a-#$%#-about-it
For those of you who are reading this and get the idea to remove loose poly fibers from your atomizer.. please be careful!
The 510 has a fiberglass wick that runs from the atty bridge down to the coil. That wick is SUPPOSED TO BE THERE!...
When you begin to taste the burnt stuff, your atty is too dry. Place a drop of juice on the bridge and it will go away...
Finally, to get that burnt taste out of the atty, soak it for an hour or two in rubbing alcohol, rinse well with water, blow it out and let it dry. The burnt taste will be gone.
... The more I 'cleaned and adjusted' them the more they failed. Eventually I got lazy just blowing them out on a paper towel at the end of the day and this lack of maintenance has made all of the difference. Atomizers are like apples... Buy them in bulk and you'll find several that are just awesome, a few that are terrible and the rest 'are what they are', a cheap electronic item that lasts 30 to 60 days and is tossed.
But you're right.. there is a HUGE difference. Less vapor production, poor quality control, massive inconsistency from carto to carto, and the pure joy of inhaling burnt and melting poly. Huge.![]()
During my first 30 days with this hobby I followed all the advice for cleaning attys to the point that I spent more time fiddling with them than I did using them. The more I 'cleaned and adjusted' them the more they failed. Eventually I got lazy just blowing them out on a paper towel at the end of the day and this lack of maintenance has made all of the difference. Atomizers are like apples... Buy them in bulk and you'll find several that are just awesome, a few that are terrible and the rest 'are what they are', a cheap electronic item that lasts 30 to 60 days and is tossed.
Less vapor production: That's a pretty consistent observation regarding the KR808D-1. It produces less vapor than a 510. Pretty much a fact.
Poor quality control: The forum is littered with observations regarding cartomizers that didn't have the groove cut (yes, from V4L), cartomizers that won't screw on, cartomizers that had varying levels of fiberfill in them, cartomizers that have varying levels of liquid in them, cartomizers that were "dead out of the box", automatic batteries (new) that stick on, PCC's that die within a week. I agree that the QC on most of these PV's isn't great.. heck, it's not even good. But the Kanger stuff appears to be worse than most.
Massive inconsistency from cart-to-cart: Yes. Period.
Inhaling burnt and melting poly: By design, when the KR808D-1 runs dry the internal poly burns and melts. You can tell me not to worry about it.... but I won't believe you. On the other hand, PV's like the 510, 901, M702, 801, etc.. do NOT have any such material in their design that melts or burns when the liquid runs dry. The fiberglass wick doesn't melt or burn at coil temps. The metal sponge mesh does not melt or burn, and if you get the cartridge to melt due to high atty bridge temps, you have abused the PV so much that you might as well take a match to it.
Feel free to counter those observations and/or facts.
The 510 sure does. Can't speak for the others, but this I know as fact.
On the other hand, PV's like the 510, 901, M702, 801, etc.. do NOT have any such material in their design that melts or burns when the liquid runs dry. The fiberglass wick doesn't melt or burn at coil temps. The metal sponge mesh does not melt or burn, and if you get the cartridge to melt due to high atty bridge temps, you have abused the PV so much that you might as well take a match to it.
Can you elaborate? What part of your 510's atty burned that isn't mentioned here: