Glassmanoak’s The Vape Tree Contest #3 and Chat Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

cocoabellaRSD

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 7, 2012
2,792
2,684
66
Texas
Morning all. have you hugged a tree today?
Hope that you have a good weekend.
Got the dog walked early this morning, before it gets too hot here in the desert southwest, got hubby's breakfast cooked & the kitchen cleaned up. Time for a cup of coffee, a vape and a visit with my vape buds.
URL]


MothersDay047.jpg.html
 
Last edited:

cocoabellaRSD

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 7, 2012
2,792
2,684
66
Texas
I saw on diane sawyers news program last night a little spot on ecigs. They talked about how one of the juices they tested had antifreeze in it. I am just hoping that juice was a fluke, perhaps one from a bad vendor somewhere. I sure don't want to be vaping antifreeze.
Or is that one of those doctored up reports to scare people off ecigs?
 

Tish Talons

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 17, 2013
1,232
2,761
Tucson, AZ
I saw on diane sawyers news program last night a little spot on ecigs. They talked about how one of the juices they tested had antifreeze in it. I am just hoping that juice was a fluke, perhaps one from a bad vendor somewhere. I sure don't want to be vaping antifreeze.
Or is that one of those doctored up reports to scare people off ecigs?

I'd like to know what they meant by "anti-freeze". Because that has been used as a scare tactic since '09 when a sample was taken from ONE e-liquid that had trace amounts of diethylene glycol in it. And those trace amounts were actually within the guidelines considered "safe" by the FDA, and also substantially less than the levels of diethylene glycol found in cigarettes. Also, I've heard them refer to PG as "anti-freeze" before as well. Its BS and I would take it with a grain of salt. These tactics of twisting the truth to prove whatever point you are trying to make are old hat in the anti-vaping lobby. What concerns me more is that they are scaring away potential new vapers.:grr:
 

glassmanoak

Resting In Peace
ECF Veteran
Feb 17, 2012
6,307
14,173
81
Lafayette, La
I'd like to know what they meant by "anti-freeze". Because that has been used as a scare tactic since '09 when a sample was taken from ONE e-liquid that had trace amounts of diethylene glycol in it. And those trace amounts were actually within the guidelines considered "safe" by the FDA, and also substantially less than the levels of diethylene glycol found in cigarettes. Also, I've heard them refer to PG as "anti-freeze" before as well. Its BS and I would take it with a grain of salt. These tactics of twisting the truth to prove whatever point you are trying to make are old hat in the anti-vaping lobby. What concerns me more is that they are scaring away potential new vapers.:grr:

This is the same scare tactic BS that has been used SO often that it is transparent. Any diethylene glycol found in ejuice would have to come from the point of manufacture of the PG or VG. If you don't have a legitimate concern, then use misdirection and out and out lies to SCARE the public. This is such a disservice by the Antis that I find it totally disgusting and dishonest!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread