GotVapes ego Variable Voltage 3-Stage Battery Kits and Spares Back In Stock!

Status
Not open for further replies.

dannoman

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Oct 22, 2010
6,896
12,330
Sugar Land, Texas USA
egovvbattery.png

Also available NOW in a stainless steel Kit!


You now receive, instead of the ego-t setups five top-coil clearomizers!

Silver spare batteries also available. These do not come with a charger but you can use most ego standard chargers (450ma or higher is recommended)

 

DonDaBoomVape

Reviewer / Blogger
ECF Veteran
Jun 5, 2009
3,353
598
79
South Florida
www.VapingGuides.com
3.9 n the 4.2 setting which is more stable then the ego tested at 4.2 which was bouncing under that at times, not bad at all
Thank you, Badkola. However, I don't know what that texting speech means. [I'm an old fart.] Are you saying?:

On the 4.2V setting, the eGo Variable measures 3.9V under load. That is more stable than the Joye eGo. On the 4.2V setting, the eGo Variable tested at 4.2V [not under load, I assume], although it was bouncing under that at times. That performance is not bad at all.​

Is that translation correct? If so, I don't understand the stability comparison to the Joye eGo.
 

dannoman

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Oct 22, 2010
6,896
12,330
Sugar Land, Texas USA
HI Don - what he meant is that a regular eGo without the 3.2v regulation, under load, was going a bit lower than the eGo Variable that we sell which in various tests comes in around the 3.9 mark or so.

What this promises you basically is a high, medium and low power setting...with no load that has been measured at 3.2/3.7/4.2. With a load and depending on the discharge of the battery, that varies. The manufacturer comments a low, medium and high vaping experience (they don't actually give numbers, they just say "low, medium, high") in their manual (which for the Chinese, its written in really good English by the way).
 

pmos69

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 19, 2011
1,750
368
Portugal
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread