One thing I've noticed about the anti-e-cig crowd is that they seem particularly vexed by the "How about them apples?" argument. Seems to me as if the entire position is based on the presumption that every smoker wants to quit smoking. If you treat the arguments as the "begging the question" that they are, the conversation goes something like this:
"Those things are dangerous!"
"Maybe, but we know for a fact that smoking cigarettes is deadly. I'll take my chances with 'potentially dangerous' over 'known to kill you in horriffic ways' any day of the week."
"But they won't help you quit!"
"I haven't smoked a cigarette since I got this."
"But you're still addicted to nicotine! You'll never quit if you keep feeding that addiction!"
"Exactly. How 'bout them apples?"
Anyway...Just a thought. Not an original one, I know, but I've had a couple of these conversations already. Frigging busybody neo-Puritan prohibitionists.
"Those things are dangerous!"
"Maybe, but we know for a fact that smoking cigarettes is deadly. I'll take my chances with 'potentially dangerous' over 'known to kill you in horriffic ways' any day of the week."
"But they won't help you quit!"
"I haven't smoked a cigarette since I got this."
"But you're still addicted to nicotine! You'll never quit if you keep feeding that addiction!"
"Exactly. How 'bout them apples?"
Anyway...Just a thought. Not an original one, I know, but I've had a couple of these conversations already. Frigging busybody neo-Puritan prohibitionists.