Mistake on lr em5 atty specs

[Di]

MISTAKE WAS MADE ON THESE SPECS----

CORRECT SPECS ARE -----

EM-Low Resistance-ATTY has the 1.6+ /-0.1ohm


Sorry for this mistake.
but it is better anyway.

 

[wolf1959]

You posted this spec from David in a previous thread (post #122 in "Eastmall low resistance atty 510 ($3.00) !!!!!!!!!!!!" thread), but it is probably a good idea to also have it clear in its own thread. I also agree that 1.6 is better; I have been using some (from another vendor; you didn't have them until this week ) for several weeks with no problem. And I just checked my tracking number and found that my 20 LR, plus other supplies, have cleared customs in China!!!

Now we just need a higher capacity cart since the LR do go through juice faster, almost as fast as a regular atty at 6 volts.

 

[Di]

You posted this spec from David in a previous thread (post #122 in "Eastmall low resistance atty 510 ($3.00) !!!!!!!!!!!!" thread), but it is probably a good idea to also have it clear in its own thread. I also agree that 1.6 is better; I have been using some (from another vendor; you didn't have them until this week ) for several weeks with no problem. And I just checked my tracking number and found that my 20 LR, plus other supplies, have cleared customs in China!!!

Now we just need a higher capacity cart since the LR do go through juice faster, almost as fast as a regular atty at 6 volts.

Thanks wolf

hahaha I know i have posted it elsewhere,

I have reposted this mistake post 3 times again today
because I find that many people either do not read the thread -
or
do not notice revised threads,

I am only human, -- and I am unfortunate enough to make a few mistakes in my time here,

and people always bring my mistakes back to bite me in the ....
sooner or later,

so -- i post many times if I revise a previous mistake,
or if I apologize for something.