New design RN4081 Atomizer?

[ACM]

I just received an e-newsletter from Aquavaporcigs.com. They are touting a new, improved atomizer for their RN4081 Super Minis. They claim the bridge is thicker, thus providing more consistent vapor production.

They also claim that they have a new battery with a less sensitive switch, eliminating the tendency for the RN4081 to start blinking after a short draw.

I'll be interested to hear more on this from someone who buys the new, improved version. I am especially curious about the atomizer. I love my Super Mini, usually, but sometimes I feel like I am trying to pull wet sand through the cart just to get a barely visible, wispy vapor. (Other times, I get clouds of the stuff - go figure.)

 

[drabble]

I just got a RN4081 atomizer from Aquavapor today. I turned in two a couple of days ago that were under warranty ( one Blew out on the very first vape, the other lasted 11 days ) I am using a 6-volt mod but I suspect they may have been defective from the beginning. I'm looking at the atomizer right now and mine doesn't look any different from what I remember but I don't have the old ones to compare. When the replacement atty's arrive I will see if there is a difference and report back here.

 

[johnny bobcat]

there are definitely at least two designs of 4081 atomizers that i have come across,
some have a serial number printed on the outside of the steel tube, one hole and a wider bridge that work much better than the ones with no serial number, two holes, and the skinny bridge

 

[Tachion]

there are definitely at least two designs of 4081 atomizers that i have come across,
some have a serial number printed on the outside of the steel tube, one hole and a wider bridge that work much better than the ones with no serial number, two holes, and the skinny bridge

I can confirm this.

The original atty in my SE vaporizer (yeah, they suckered me in) died the other day (it was the two-hole one), so I went in and the guys at the kiosk replaced it for me no problem with a one-hole that looked slightly different (hey, at least they stick to their 12 month warranty!).

This thing now produces an insane amount of vapor compared to my old one that's it's crazy... I'd say it even produces as much as the videos of some of the 510s I've seen.

If anyone knows where I can order the better, one-holed attys, let me know. If I can get my hands on a few of the better ones, maybe I won't feel inclined to upgrade to the 510!

 

[Tachion]

Just to add to what I already said, based on the description they gave you in the newsletter, they probably carry the same one I've got, i.e. the better one.

I may order one of their attys (and batteries) in the next few days, since I do want a spare of both, just in case. I'll report back with what I find if and when I do!

 

[johnny bobcat]

i got mine from totally wicked, theyre a little under 7 bucks each if you buy the five pack, and mine arrived within three days

 

[Tachion]

i got mine from totally wicked, theyre a little under 7 bucks each if you buy the five pack, and mine arrived within three days

Is the RN4081 they sell the "Super Electronic Cigarette"? I saw that and all the parts looked similar, but I wasn't sure. And they're the "better" attys?

 

[MisterStick]

Tachion, Yes, the RN4081 that TW sells is called the "Super E. Cigarette". I received my Super E. from TW last week, and the box had RN4081 printed on it.

I'd be interested in the new version of the atomizer. I have an atomizer coming from Electronic Ash this week, as well as some extras from TW. I'll see if they correspond or not.

I also ordered some of the double capacity carts for the RN4081. The capacity of the cart was the only real complaint that I would have if I had to pick something out that is wrong with the RN8041.

 

[Jim Davis]

I just received an e-newsletter from Aquavaporcigs.com. They are touting a new, improved atomizer for their RN4081 Super Minis. They claim the bridge is thicker, thus providing more consistent vapor production.

They also claim that they have a new battery with a less sensitive switch, eliminating the tendency for the RN4081 to start blinking after a short draw.

I'll be interested to hear more on this from someone who buys the new, improved version. I am especially curious about the atomizer. I love my Super Mini, usually, but sometimes I feel like I am trying to pull wet sand through the cart just to get a barely visible, wispy vapor. (Other times, I get clouds of the stuff - go figure.)

They just came out with a 1 piece cartomizer to fit the 4081. that might be what they're talking about.

 

[Colonel Angus]

I got some replacement rn4081 attys from nosmoke4u (dot com) - and they are definitely bigger and better bridges. They also have the one of the only push-button manual batteries I could find for the rn4081, and the shipping is cheap- only $5.00 for pretty much whatever you order. Their website is pretty basic, but the owner- Chip, contacted me personally with each order to thank me, and everything came in 3 days by priority mail.

 

[StephanAdler]

I would like to confirm that totallywicked sells the single hole attys, they dont say so on the site but they arrived today $7 a piece and they r single hole with a fat bridge, huuuge difference in vapor production.

 

[ACM]

Does anyone have any side-by-side pics they can post of the old vs. the new design of these atomizers?

 

[dk2]

Sorry I don't have any picks but the new ones are easy to describe and they work amazing tons more vaper

differences:

the new atomizers have only one hole on the side; the old ones have two holes on the side across from each other

the new atomizers have a flat bridge which appears to make more contact accross the filler; the bridge on the old atomizers kind of comes to a point less contact across the filler cartridge

the new atomizers have a serial number on the outside of atomizer on the steel; the old atomizers have no serial number on the outside of the atomizer on the steel

similarities: both have a hole on the top in the brass section that makes contact with the battery

bridge width seems to be the same to my eyes

 

[danlisi]

I recently got 2of the new ones and they defiantly are better I also got a new style batt with 4 notches in it instead of 2 and it works great!

 

[cos]

Sorry I don't have any picks but the new ones are easy to describe and they work amazing tons more vaper

differences:

the new atomizers have only one hole on the side; the old ones have two holes on the side across from each other

the new atomizers have a flat bridge which appears to make more contact accross the filler; the bridge on the old atomizers kind of comes to a point less contact across the filler cartridge

the new atomizers have a serial number on the outside of atomizer on the steel; the old atomizers have no serial number on the outside of the atomizer on the steel

similarities: both have a hole on the top in the brass section that makes contact with the battery

bridge width seems to be the same to my eyes

yep thyese 1 hole attys rock. what i notcie besuides sioo much vapor is the smoothness of the hit. does anyone else feel same. i love these things. i bought a bunch from Vapor Kings. i should be all set for a year at least. someone said these attys last a real long time. so far i am still on my first 4081 atty and vaping it at 3.7v and also 6 v and been doing this for 2 months with it. still loaded with vapor and .... kicking TH. of course tyhe TH may be my nic mg but i just love this atty and to be honest it even compares to the Low Resistance attys out there. if they dont equal to it is a very close match so i am sold on these.

 

[johnny bobcat]

I just got some new 4081s and it is yet a third style, these have the serial number and also have two holes, one slightly larger than the other (not sure why, but its the same on all of them). One interesting change is that the cart is frosted, as opposed to glossy. Also the ceramic cup has changed, there is less space between the walls of it and the coil (which also looks to be shorter and somewhat thicker), and the fiber inside the coil extends through it and down into the nickel foam horizontally, not vertically up into the bridge like other atties. Not a huge difference in performance between these and the one holes, but they are very slightly better. Not much, but still noticeable.

 

[ACM]

I got my 4081 cartomizers last week from www.aquavaporcig.com and they rock. I was a little concerned at first but after a few refills and a couple of days these things really started performing. Very smooth draw and tons more vapor than the 3 piece setup. I've been using the same one for over a week and all is good.

Mine arrived today. I am eager to test them out. I read somewhere that you should only refill them about 10 times, then toss them. Can anyone confirm this? If it's true, does anyone know why?

 

[jj2]

there are definitely at least two designs of 4081 atomizers that i have come across,
some have a serial number printed on the outside of the steel tube, one hole and a wider bridge that work much better than the ones with no serial number, two holes, and the skinny bridge

Totally agree with this.

 

[jj2]

I can confirm this.

The original atty in my SE vaporizer (yeah, they suckered me in) died the other day (it was the two-hole one), so I went in and the guys at the kiosk replaced it for me no problem with a one-hole that looked slightly different (hey, at least they stick to their 12 month warranty!).

This thing now produces an insane amount of vapor compared to my old one that's it's crazy... I'd say it even produces as much as the videos of some of the 510s I've seen.

If anyone knows where I can order the better, one-holed attys, let me know. If I can get my hands on a few of the better ones, maybe I won't feel inclined to upgrade to the 510!

Last order I got form Heavens Gifts had them.

 

[jj2]

They just came out with a 1 piece cartomizer to fit the 4081. that might be what they're talking about.

So happy to see you!!!!!!!!