New Frugal Gourmet line, the “Simple” edition from Grizzly Vapes

Status
Not open for further replies.

firephly

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 22, 2013
3,297
8,084
CA
For anyone who is interested, here it is. The maker of the Grizzly Vapes line: Koko Bear, Nanner Bear, and Polar Bear, has a new line. Since the bears are so awesome I've been curious what the new line will be.

"From the man who brought you Nanner Bear comes the new Simple line. The Simple juices are just that, simple flavors. These are crafted using the same special processes that go into all Grizzly Vapes juices. This means they're great right out of the bottle, no steeping needed, last for a LONG time without any noticeable change in flavor and have that smooth, easy hit with well developed flavors. The Simple only relates to the actual flavor profile itself. Where the three bears have extremely complex flavors that involve a multitude of ingredients, these are... well, a little more simple :) Same great craftsmanship, almost half the price!


The Simple line will only tickle your wallet at 8 bucks for 30ml. The goal for this line was to bring the quality and craftsmanship of a premium blend like Nannerbear and apply it to a simple flavor profile to get the price down to something that even the most frugal vaper’s budget can handle. You wont find a better made juice than this at this price point.


There are currently 4 flavors up in limited quantity. A 5th will be coming soon and we have plans to continually expand on the line in the future."


They can all be found in the USA E-liquid section of the store at Vaporizers, Ecigs and Accessories

This is Simple 1 "It's one of the most "true" tasting tobacco vapes I've had. But it's not trying to be a cigarette. Simple 1 tastes like a combination of a natural non burly cut pipe tobacco and a natural flavored chewing tobacco. It has the peaty tones and woody notes of both. It's just begging to be paired with a nice hoppy beer or a couple fingers of smokey whiskey. Might not be a flavor for 'everyone' but if you're looking for a "non" sweet tobacco vape, this might just hit it out of the park for you. "

This is Simple 2 "Straight up chocolate mint. No bells, no whistles other than the love and attention that our juice man puts into all his work. This has a pronounced chocolate flavor with a minty undertone to keep it from getting cloying. It's quite sweet and rich."

This is Simple 3 "A nice, simple, banana vape. Tank safe and tasty."


This is Simple 4 "So far the crowd favorite of the simple line. It's an orange flavor. A nice, sweet citrus."

The maker says these are max VG like the other line but he added distilled water to make it work in clearos. It wicks like a 50/50
 
Last edited:

firephly

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 22, 2013
3,297
8,084
CA
Thanks dude! I ordered #2 and #4 immediately… Love grizzly!!!

You're not trying #1?

I think I'll try 2 and 4.

He said that #1 is "It's a pretty unique flavor. It's a bold tobacco with a peaty, almost woodsy tone. if you happened to dip natural cut tobacco or smoke any unflavored, bold pipe tobaccos this will resonate with you. it's not a sweet vape and it's one of the truest tobacco tastes I've ever had. It's still a simple line juice but it's got a pretty nifty flavor. Some of you will hate it, others will fall in love with it immediately.

If you were a dip user before vaping instead of a smoker, this juice might be the flavor you've been lookin for. I dont wanna scare off people who think dipping is gross, you've seriously gotta give this one a try. "


I'm not sure I'd like #1 but I'm curious....
 
Last edited:

lasttango

What would Freud say?
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 10, 2010
4,067
2,286
Wilmington, DE / Ithaca, NY
www.last.fm
You're not trying #1?

Not a fan of tobacco flavors really… especially with descriptions like peaty and bold… I like tobacco flavor as a "tone" or lab flavors like halo freedom, vs tampa or nhaler octane… but nets make me gag… as do particular flavorings… like m type.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread