Hi,
I'm curious why there is not more discussion of the number of holes in the comparisons of ecigs. So far we have tried the one-hole "tried and true" DSE901 and the pen-style DSE801. There was so much air coming in from the 801 that we found it difficult to maintain a consistent drag. We got a good consistent drag from the 901.
And what do you get with a four-hole design?
Dave W.
I'm curious why there is not more discussion of the number of holes in the comparisons of ecigs. So far we have tried the one-hole "tried and true" DSE901 and the pen-style DSE801. There was so much air coming in from the 801 that we found it difficult to maintain a consistent drag. We got a good consistent drag from the 901.
And what do you get with a four-hole design?