Replicating Johnson Creek

Status
Not open for further replies.

roxics

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 25, 2009
701
193
Detroit MI
Sorry for so many new posts. I've got a ton of questions. Has anyone fairly-successfully replicated Johnson Creek stuff. Specifically JC original, Red Oak domestic and Spiced Apple Cider?

The new current recipes I'm talking about. I never had their old stuff before they changed it way back when.

I love their liquids. Never perfumey, always great.

Anyone have a shopping list they can give me. :)
 

GregH

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 28, 2009
762
81
Georgia USA
Sorry I don't understand. Is there something wrong with Johnson Creek? I haven't heard anything.

No, there isn't anything wrong with Johnson Creek. The FDA's letter to them was rubbish, and everyone knows it. The FDA declared their intention of regulating e-cigs as drug devices and, therefore, cited Johnson Creek for not meeting the very strict operating protocols for a drug maker. It was all part of the FDA's posturing and bullying while a court case deciding this very issue is still in litigation. Hopefully, the FDA's loss of appeal handed down today will at least slow them down in future attempts to push for regulation as pharmaceuticals.
 

jerrydon10

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Well one way to replicate what Johnson creek does it to write yourself about 25 epa viloations :)

Excuse me? There were no EPA OR FDA violations.....Prove that! The FDA letter was horse hockey and today the appeals court ruled that e-cigs are NOT drug delivery devices clearing JC of ALL the nonsense brought against them by jack-booted government thugs who want to bring down the entire e-cig industry.

Johnson Creek is one of the oldest and finest juice companies out there. The FDA is left holding their pickle in their hand after this court ruling.

Shop with confidence there. They produce some of the finest juices in the world. And no, I do not represent JC in any way. In fact I am a competitor.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread