Just purchased a dual-serial battery device. (150w Vapmod). Before anything, I usually vape within 20-50W, though roughly once a month or so, I do experiment with much thicker gauges or high wattage builds, like twisted, claptons, zippers, etc. That's where the 100W calls for...
I've been having some trouble understanding the significance of a series or parallel type battery connection in regulated devices. I though I had it, but multiple sources from a quick google search got me confused. The statement of 'In series the amps stay the same, that's why its dangerous for high wattages + low subohms', does it apply here for regulated? I don't think so, but I need confirmation... Basically...
Dual parallel (both 20A/4.2V max batts):
4.2V @ 20A + 20A
=4.2V (merged) @ 40A available
Dual serial (both 20A /4.2V max batts):
4.2V + 4.2V @ 20A
=8.4V @ 20A available (merged)
The dual parallel has 40A to negate 'load', by 'increased drain available' (but lower voltage available).
The dual serial has 8.4V to negate 'load' by 'decreased drain needed' (as higher voltage available).
Since it is directly related, we can observe (on dual 20A 4.2v charged):
168W (parallel)
(40A x 4.2V= 168W)
- will pull 20A+20A at 4.2V
- remember it has 40A total so,
- 40A pull /40A avail '100% load'
168W (serial)
(20A x 8.4V =168W)
- will pull 20A at 4.2V+4.2V
- remember it has 20A total so,
- 20A pull /20A avail '100% load'
In both cases, irregardless of atty resistance, the amp & volt draw is directly proportionate & exactly the same (100% of drain capability), after being considered it's entire status in a parallel or serial circumstance.
Hence,
- In parallel APVs, amps available is doubled, along with amps required for a set watt; as voltage is 'halved'.
- In serial APVs, amps available is halved, along with amps required for a set watt; as voltage is 'doubled'.
Due to that relationship, the drain is similar to each other. Drain quantity and usage time on both dual setups will be the same as:
Parallel: 5000mAh @ 3.7v nominal = 18.5W/hr
Serial: 2500mah @ 7.4v nominal = 18.5W/hr
The increase in mAh for parallel is followed suit by an increase of nominal voltage in the serial, hence there is no difference. There is no difference in 'real' (user observed) capacity between both, both have similar 'real' capacity, wattage set being the same... There is only a difference with single cell.
Single cell: 2500mah @ 3.7v nominal = 9.25Wh
Now, it is the set wattage that determines how much to be pulled. It is then the 'independent' side that boosts/bucks to achieve set wattage based on resistance.
Remember that the whole point of the regulation is to remove the atty's resistance from the battery circuit. It is the chip now that is the 'new battery'. This ''new battery'', it's volts and amps are as high/low as it is engineered to be. Wattage is set and locked & it's the manipulation of Volts and Amps to provide that wattage, as RESISTANCE is now involved. Everything here is independent of all the above, except Wattage. Wattage remains the same, but it's a whole different circuit and you can perform NO direct relations or calculations with anything above this part). Basically, everything before this part is merely 'For 168W'. Everything in this isolated part is 'For 168W based on (x)ohms'
(if the chip is capable of doing so):
Eg. 168W @ 0.5ohm = 9.2V / 18A
Eg. 168W @ 0.1ohm = 4.1V / 40A.
That being said, so the real practical advantage to BOTH dual parallel / serial regulated is :
- twice the drain available (one due to increased A; other due to increased V)
- twice the real capacity than a single cell.
The only practical advantage to a parallel: A safer and a more 'balanced' drain?
(not including losses of the circuit)
The only practical advantage to a serial: Ever-ever-ever so slightly better batt endurance?
(some say, buck-only circuits like in serial setups are more efficient, but only by a few % at most
Please discuss or correct me if I am wrong... It's been years from my physics lessons...
*Also, all these assumes that the related circuit will be designed according to the setup (3.7v or 7.4v nominal). Of course you are not gonna chuck 8.4V to a board or chip that can only take 4.5V max.
I've been having some trouble understanding the significance of a series or parallel type battery connection in regulated devices. I though I had it, but multiple sources from a quick google search got me confused. The statement of 'In series the amps stay the same, that's why its dangerous for high wattages + low subohms', does it apply here for regulated? I don't think so, but I need confirmation... Basically...
Dual parallel (both 20A/4.2V max batts):
4.2V @ 20A + 20A
=4.2V (merged) @ 40A available
Dual serial (both 20A /4.2V max batts):
4.2V + 4.2V @ 20A
=8.4V @ 20A available (merged)
The dual parallel has 40A to negate 'load', by 'increased drain available' (but lower voltage available).
The dual serial has 8.4V to negate 'load' by 'decreased drain needed' (as higher voltage available).
Since it is directly related, we can observe (on dual 20A 4.2v charged):
168W (parallel)
(40A x 4.2V= 168W)
- will pull 20A+20A at 4.2V
- remember it has 40A total so,
- 40A pull /40A avail '100% load'
168W (serial)
(20A x 8.4V =168W)
- will pull 20A at 4.2V+4.2V
- remember it has 20A total so,
- 20A pull /20A avail '100% load'
In both cases, irregardless of atty resistance, the amp & volt draw is directly proportionate & exactly the same (100% of drain capability), after being considered it's entire status in a parallel or serial circumstance.
Hence,
- In parallel APVs, amps available is doubled, along with amps required for a set watt; as voltage is 'halved'.
- In serial APVs, amps available is halved, along with amps required for a set watt; as voltage is 'doubled'.
Due to that relationship, the drain is similar to each other. Drain quantity and usage time on both dual setups will be the same as:
Parallel: 5000mAh @ 3.7v nominal = 18.5W/hr
Serial: 2500mah @ 7.4v nominal = 18.5W/hr
The increase in mAh for parallel is followed suit by an increase of nominal voltage in the serial, hence there is no difference. There is no difference in 'real' (user observed) capacity between both, both have similar 'real' capacity, wattage set being the same... There is only a difference with single cell.
Single cell: 2500mah @ 3.7v nominal = 9.25Wh
Now, it is the set wattage that determines how much to be pulled. It is then the 'independent' side that boosts/bucks to achieve set wattage based on resistance.
Remember that the whole point of the regulation is to remove the atty's resistance from the battery circuit. It is the chip now that is the 'new battery'. This ''new battery'', it's volts and amps are as high/low as it is engineered to be. Wattage is set and locked & it's the manipulation of Volts and Amps to provide that wattage, as RESISTANCE is now involved. Everything here is independent of all the above, except Wattage. Wattage remains the same, but it's a whole different circuit and you can perform NO direct relations or calculations with anything above this part). Basically, everything before this part is merely 'For 168W'. Everything in this isolated part is 'For 168W based on (x)ohms'
(if the chip is capable of doing so):
Eg. 168W @ 0.5ohm = 9.2V / 18A
Eg. 168W @ 0.1ohm = 4.1V / 40A.
That being said, so the real practical advantage to BOTH dual parallel / serial regulated is :
- twice the drain available (one due to increased A; other due to increased V)
- twice the real capacity than a single cell.
The only practical advantage to a parallel: A safer and a more 'balanced' drain?
(not including losses of the circuit)
The only practical advantage to a serial: Ever-ever-ever so slightly better batt endurance?
(some say, buck-only circuits like in serial setups are more efficient, but only by a few % at most
Please discuss or correct me if I am wrong... It's been years from my physics lessons...
*Also, all these assumes that the related circuit will be designed according to the setup (3.7v or 7.4v nominal). Of course you are not gonna chuck 8.4V to a board or chip that can only take 4.5V max.
Last edited: