Smok TFV4 Stands above the competion

Status
Not open for further replies.

Icey

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 2, 2010
970
238
Skokie
Greetings, vapors.

I couldn't imagine jumping the band wagon gun again, but here I am. Reviewing another tank for the masses. It amazes me each time something comes out and I become obligated to buying it being sold on not only the design but the sheer improvement of vaping, filling, and quality of vaping. I give you... The Smok TFV4 review. Purchased from VaperRoyalty for only $39 + free shipping Priority. Can't beat that xD

The TFV4 was purchased about two weeks ago before rip trippers got a chance of reviewing it. However, what rip didn't mention missed out some major details.

Pros:

* 5/5 Makes massive clouds
* 5/5 on spot full flavor
* Top filling ease of use
* 4 air flow chambers
* Both coils are optimized for either lung/mouth use
* Stainless steel flush design
* Comes with an RBA prebuilt, quad coil, & a tri-coil
* No leaks of any kind (will go into more detail on this)
* No dragon spit backs, aka gurgling, and or juice going into mouth
* Very easy learning curve either new or professional vapors
* Holds 5ml juice
* Really easy to dismantle and clean.
* Tank consistently stays wet, you can see bubbles floating towards the top

Cons:

* Huge. Reminds me as rip mentioned the size as that of a sub tank
* Not user friendly to single battery users. This will drain fast in an hour or so
* Coils go bad possibly less than a week, but requires more further testing due to juice quality
* Coils are $20 a pop for a 5 pack. Possibly will go down in price eventually since it's fairly new
* 40w or higher required if you plan on using this tank, otherwise you're SOL getting soft weak vapor
* Tank will likely to over heat, but not the coil
* This tank will eat your juices faster than a kanger or aspire triton

I'm a little bothered that rip missed out putting these essential information for the masses. But you're more than welcome to see my review video bellow, enjoy.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread