There Policy is suppose to include electronic cigarettes too I heard, but the one manager said it was OK to use with in the 25 feet of this particular store.
Could be worst like the state ban we have where you can not vape in any inside public place. Thank you for sharing your experience, Vape OnI have personally boycotted STARBUCKS for about a year now, when I found out they had an anti vaping rule in there shops. I can find a wireless hang out and good coffee too, without STARBUCKS. I.E., Bigby Coffee does not have an anti vaping ordinance.![]()
What does an 'uppie' and foot fetish video of someone smoking a cigarette have to do with challenging Starbucks' vaping ban? Did they know they were being filmed, or was the guy hiding in the bushes?
Funny. I still see people smoking at the tables outside of Starbucks from time to time in Sacramento. Not vaping, smoking!
Thats some hard hitting journalism there or perhaps the NSA spycams are at work lol. Its official all the worlds problems have been solved, now we have the time to stalk girls smoking outside of starbucks.
Hiding! No, we were the table next to them in a public place. Never really noticed the feet as you pointed out here, but have to admit she is a cute gal.What does an 'uppie' and foot fetish video of someone smoking a cigarette have to do with challenging Starbucks' vaping ban? Did they know they were being filmed, or was the guy hiding in the bushes?
Funny. I still see people smoking at the tables outside of Starbucks from time to time in Sacramento. Not vaping, smoking!
CITIZENS AGAINST GOVERNMENT ENCROACHMENT CITOYENS ANTI GOUVERNEMENT ENVAHISSANT: BELIEFS, MANIPULATION AND LIES IN THE TOBACCO ISSUE - Robert MolimardThus the authors have classified 4749 active smokers as victims of passive smoking using the specious argument that when smoking in their offices they also inhale the ambient air filled with their own smoke! I have previously produced a complete analysis of this outrageous report [5]. It obviously did not elicit any response. In my analysis, I pointed out that this report was presented at a conference held in Luxembourg on June 2, 2005, in the presence of the highest authorities of Europe, by the associations mandated to adopt it and under the sponsorship of GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer precisely at the same moment as the launch of Champix ®.
But in terms of marketing, the operation is a failure. Indeed, not only have smokers, despite being stigmatized and persecuted, did not rush off to the pharmacies in response to the bans, but sales of all drugs known as nicotine replacement therapy are plummeting. And this notwithstanding the intense indirect television advertising that should in fact be banned since in France it is not permitted to advertize for medication that is reimbursed by social security. One has to be blind not to see through their hardly veiled scheme that these ads make smokers aware of the drugs that are eligible for reimbursement so they can insist that their doctor prescribes those particular drugs to them.
But the major concern for anyone who really cares about the health of smokers, is that such drastic measures are counterproductive to smoking cessation. The official sales of tobacco increased while the smuggling figures do not show any reduction. The prevalence of smoking among youth is increasing. Smoking cessation consultations are increasingly abandoned by their clients. The Diplomas of Tobacology no longer attract any students. In defense of their proper identity, smokers now sink into themselves and shut themselves off in a way that public health messages [6] can no longer reach them.
I have personally boycotted STARBUCKS for about a year now, when I found out they had an anti vaping rule in there shops. I can find a wireless hang out and good coffee too, without STARBUCKS. I.E., Bigby Coffee does not have an anti vaping ordinance.![]()