Steve Forbes Weighs In On The Current Hysteria.
- Thread starter jwbnyc
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
This is the phrase we should all use when referring to the glANTZ.
tobacco Control terrorists need to be named and shamed.
Too bad there's not enough vapers to get Steve Forbes elected president. If he runs this time, I'll vote for him.
Excellent article with a no-holds-barred approach, and in a major publication.
NorthOfAtlanta, yep, "antismoking jihadists"....Sums up the ANTZ in 2 words. Absolute brilliance.
NorthOfAtlanta, yep, "antismoking jihadists"....Sums up the ANTZ in 2 words. Absolute brilliance.
except I'd rewrite it as
Antismoker jihadis
to highlight the anti-human focus of their barbarity
Also, ANTs: Anti-Nicotine Tyrants. Describes their tyrannical attitude towards vapes and smokers.
Just a really fantastic article about the 'scientifically impoverished' junk science-purveyors and 'jihadists'.
Gotta love Steve Forbes and Sally Satel. These two certainly have a way with words.
Gotta love Steve Forbes and Sally Satel. These two certainly have a way with words.
Last edited:
It's a better description but you lose the ability to say `or as Steve Forbes calls them "antismoking jihadists"`with a link to one fine pro e-cigarette opinion.
The associated article by Sally Satel was equally right-to-the-point:
New Surgeon General Should Prescribe Scientific Honesty On E-Cigarettes
EDIT: I'd suggest we all send these articles (in regular mail - it carries more weight) to our senators and congressmen.
Last edited:
This is a case of government stupidity that has caught Mr. Forbes's attention. The OP link is the second article he's written on the topic. I'm a subscriber to the print version and read his first rant about it about a month ago, then forgot to come here and share it. His editorial is the first thing I turn to when the new issue arrives.
E-Cigs: A Lifesaver That Health Fascists Want To Kill
E-Cigs: A Lifesaver That Health Fascists Want To Kill
"But theres also another factor at work: an intolerant, puritanical mind-set that is offended because e-cigs make abstaining from or giving up cigarettes too easy. Forsaking smoking should involve pain, not pleasure!"
Really good phrasing of this concept that we've pointed out from time to time
Points to the great H L Mencken quote on puritans. And smart of Steve knowing who his readership is. lol.... But that's only one side - control for the sake of control is the other - his "The fanatical fervor of antismoking crusaders wont be stopped by objective science." fits that perfectly, as well.
Really good phrasing of this concept that we've pointed out from time to time
Points to the great H L Mencken quote on puritans. And smart of Steve knowing who his readership is. lol.... But that's only one side - control for the sake of control is the other - his "The fanatical fervor of antismoking crusaders wont be stopped by objective science." fits that perfectly, as well.
Great stuff. I wish we could get CNN and Fox to do a full review of this material on prime time TV.
Why don't you Forward all this Info to them and Ask them to do it?
They'll never do it, since it's politically unpopular to both audiences. Now if the report included something about lung hemorrhages or dead puppies, CNN would run it. Likewise, if there was some sort of White House conspiracy or ISIS tie in, Fox would be all over it.
Why am I not surprised Gutfeld is the one person on that network that would report on this?
The last one is Stossel, for whatever that's worth to you...Why am I not surprised Gutfeld is the one person on that network that would report on this?
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
