Subtank mini & nano, which one is better?

[Zhen Sun]

Recently Kanger lanuched new Subtank mini & nano, and they seem quite alike, which one is better?

 

[Markill]

The mini has the option for a rba base i believe, while the nano doesn't. If I'm wrong, then neither has it. The only other difference is the size of the tank

 

[javarivanhans]

I just received both of them. Love them both! the nano seems to be much hotter than the mini. Both (with the 0.5ohm coil) seem to produce plenty of vaper at lower watts. Originally when I was shopping everyone said to do 30watts but upon getting them 20+ just feels HOT and dry. Lately I've been vaping them at 13.5-18watts. Good for battery life but I wonder if there isn't anything else to it.

 

[javarivanhans]

BTW I am running mine on two Eleaf 30watters

 

[_JB_]

I picked up a Mini this evening at the B&M and looked at the Nano. Its hard to say which is better without trying the Nano. There is no build deck for the Nano and the tank holds less so I prefer the Mini but I see no reason that the 2 would vape much differently.

 

[dhood]

I've got a mini on order, should be here any day. I like the fact that it has a build deck, unlike the nano. I hear they vape extremely well, no matter which one you choose. apparently Kanger did a good job on the coils and airflow.

 

[Lova]

Only difference should be that Mini has got the RBA head and Nano doesn't, also, Mini is 22mm in diameter and Nano is 18.5mm in diameter.

Compared to the full-sized 25mm subtank, the Mini has got larger airflow through the RBA head.

 

[TopCatJimi]

I ordered the mini .. i have the 25mm subtank .. I cant wait to try them both together

 

[serenity21899]

I should get my Mini today. I do not have the 25mm version. I chose the Mini over the Nano because it has the RBA deck, where the Nano doesn't and because it will best fit my devices.