Sugestions and Ideas for new GG parts !
- Thread starter D Stanley Querfurth
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
it will be thin and some people complained that these mouthpieces bend easily pt
I know it isn't as strong and was careful with mine so I didn't have any issue.
I'm still running two V2 with NO problems on adjustable tip-I live mine. But then I don't have a 5 inch drip tip either. And I only drop them with tips in place. ?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
it is a old story, we all would like more drip tip mouthpieces for penny 2 & 3, even if they are the thin ones !!!
but Imeo had more than one or two complains about them, so he decided, for now ,not to make them as they were......
in my opinion Imeo is a perfectionist, and he won´t do them if there are issues...until he makes them better .....
Last edited:
me too, until the first 2 no problems anymore !!! and i be able to hide the worse ones in my penny v2 with double body ....
I can make them stronger for sure guys but if diameter goes to 10mm instead of 9mm now, we need a new cap too
you told me before, but are you shure there is no oring ?
now the penny v2 oring itself (material) has a diameter of 2,7 mm.
if it would be possible to get a oring with 2,2 mm- we would get the space we need ,
0,5 mm on each side .
and it would work with the cap because there is space 1mm left (11 mm actual space) ....
correct me if i am wrong !!!
Last edited:
sure Stan. The reason is that an o-ring at 2,2 will not touch the upper surface of the body and it will not seal the construction
you are right, that is one thing i did not understand.... .... my first thought was, hey then take 2 orings, but that would be to much i think, i would produce a gap between body and cap...
thx for the answere Imeo
so here is a new suggestion
how about a new short collectors tank for the GGTS- the idea is to make it possible to connect Penelope directly on the ggts 510 connection. only thing needed is the missing part in the picture wich makes a nice look and would also collect liquid....
stan
how about a new short collectors tank for the GGTS- the idea is to make it possible to connect Penelope directly on the ggts 510 connection. only thing needed is the missing part in the picture wich makes a nice look and would also collect liquid....
stan
Stanley better say 23mm Esterigon collector tank??
Or better say we want for the Lego 23mm telescopic Esterigon ?? Lol that's sound even better
GGTE
On GGTS this would increase the length of the device because of ggts pin. You don't gain much by doing that collector tank. If imeo provides a short pin with it and air control then we have a good combination for ggts. But then it is easier to make a new connector like esterigon and then we can use it with justGG as well.
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
nice Idea´s Its and aal !!!
my idea was to minimise connections on a ggts by direkt use of the ggts 510 connection, and giving it a collectors tank which will minimise diameter from GGTS to Penny.........
- if it will be with airflow like esterigon, cool idea !!!
- also the idea for a esterigon connector for ggts and just gg is cool !!!
my idea was to minimise connections on a ggts by direkt use of the ggts 510 connection, and giving it a collectors tank which will minimise diameter from GGTS to Penny.........
- if it will be with airflow like esterigon, cool idea !!!
- also the idea for a esterigon connector for ggts and just gg is cool !!!
I like the idea of reusing the ggts connector but as I said imeo has to provide a short pin.
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
why does he have to ? would be the same as using 4in1 cap ???
i understand that you mean for the lenght of the mod, but why do you not shorten it yourself ???
i understand that you mean for the lenght of the mod, but why do you not shorten it yourself ???
- Status
