The Best Clearomizer I Have Used Out Of All Of Them

Status
Not open for further replies.

Chrispixx

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 26, 2012
159
49
Buffalo,N.Y.
I have tried a few styles of clearomizers from different manufacturers Vision, Kanger T2. Kanger T3 and i thought i was set with the Kanger T2 (mine work good). But then i found these: Innokin I6 Dual Coil Clearomizer

I have two and i wish i had 10 more. They come apart from the bottom like T3's to clean but also the tip screws off to fill like the Vision & Kanger T2. They have replaceable coil heads.

One tip.. unscrew the bottom to remove the coil assembly cut the wicks down to 1/4" from the coil, untwist the wicks, fluff, then reassemble. Fill from the top.

The reason for trimming the wicks back is that they are long and there are 4 of them (dual coil), they take up quite a bit of room inside so trimming allows more juice to be added.

I am rocking mine on a stock eGo 1100 mah and they are fog machines. They hold less juice than the kangers but that is a good compromise for how well they work.


i6colorsnew.jpg


I62.jpg
 
Last edited:

Chrispixx

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 26, 2012
159
49
Buffalo,N.Y.
Glad your best is the T3 and it is working for you, i threw mine in the trash.

The T2 was my first and favorite, Then i tried the T3 that went bye-bye, then came the Innokin mentioned above which is now my favorite over the T2.

I still like and use my T2's but the Innokin's are working great. I wish they held as much as the Kangers but that is a drawback i am willing to live with based on their performance. They use more juice overall because of the dual coils (4 wicks) but that is liveable too.
 

billo

Super Member
ECF Veteran
May 1, 2009
600
118
Wesley Chapel, FL
As mentioned above, I ordered one, and I got it today.

So far, I think it's great also. It DOES have even more vapor than the T3, and the taste is fine.
I'll have to see how it works out over time with leaking, cleaning, etc.

EDit : After about 30 hours they DO have a bad problem. I'm getting juice in my mouth fairly regularly !
I have only filled them about 1/2 way, and have tightened the top as tight as it goes, but still juice in
my mouth about 1/3 the time.(Comes and goes.) It really looks like a lousy design, since you must tighten the top (mouthpiece) to seal the juice out of the air passage. BUT the screws on the mouthpiece keep you from tightening it enough to get a good seal to the bottom piece. So it's ineveitable that some juice could get into the air passage. At least that's what I think is happeneng.

I also notice that the bottom section can be unscewed a little to make it higher. This may solve the problem, but one shouldn't have to mess with something new like that.And I'm not sure that will fix it.

The T2 and T3 kanger do not have this problem. The mouthpiece can't be removed and so is sealed well at all times.
 
Last edited:
These look very similar to the (single coil) vision V3s I've been using with great success.

It almost looks like the bottom post and head assembly would be compatible with the tanks and tips I already have.

Motek777, the V3 has a much stiffer draw than the T3 and this looks to be built quite similar. Strangely though, I'm beginning to appreciate a lighter draw more and more. I was initially drawing into my mouth and then inhaling which the stiffer draw was great for but now I draw straight into my lungs and I'm getting much better TH and flavor that way with a light draw.

If only I could get my T3s to stop flooding...

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
 
Last edited:
I have tried a few styles of clearomizers from different manufacturers Vision, Kanger T2. Kanger T3 and i thought i was set with the Kanger T2 (mine work good). But then i found these: Innokin I6 Dual Coil Clearomizer

I have two and i wish i had 10 more. They come apart from the bottom like T3's to clean but also the tip screws off to fill like the Vision & Kanger T2. They have replaceable coil heads.

One tip.. unscrew the bottom to remove the coil assembly cut the wicks down to 1/4" from the coil, untwist the wicks, fluff, then reassemble. Fill from the top.

The reason for trimming the wicks back is that they are long and there are 4 of them (dual coil), they take up quite a bit of room inside so trimming allows more juice to be added.

I am rocking mine on a stock eGo 1100 mah and they are fog machines. They hold less juice than the kangers but that is a good compromise for how well they work.


i6colorsnew.jpg


I62.jpg

I'd like to see a dual coil Kanger T3. Imagine two bottom coils side by side. If they were made as well as the existing T3's then dry hits wouldn't occur and no modding needed.
 

spark001uk

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 7, 2009
70
10
Just bought one here in UK, from www.vapour-room.com , and so far I'm fairly impressed, gives a very full-on vape! The battery usage isn't much more than usual, as the dual coil head measures 2ohm total (some people believed it was two 2ohm coils in parallel = 1ohm, this is not true), I believe it's either two 4ohm coils in parallel, or indeed two 1ohm in series. The TW in comparison is 2.4ohm, so coming from that it's not a lot more battery drain. I notice there's no secondary seal in the neck of the tank tho, whereas my TW RCS v3 had one? It still seals ok, it just means you end up with juice around the mouthpiece every time you take it out. As for build quality, slightly better than the TW (apart from the lack of second seal), though I have noticed these clearomisers all seem to suffer slightly from the centre post sitting slightly off centre, a friend's iclear was sat so far off centre I reckon juice would have gone up the mouthpiece! However, we fiddled about with it a bit and managed to make it a bit better. I do think the manufacture of these things needs a bit more precision, and hopefully it will come soon. Overall very good tho, worth the money.
 
Last edited:

spark001uk

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 7, 2009
70
10
In addition to what ive said above, ive just noticed something. Whenever i unscrew the mouthpiece on this innokin, a load of juice is still retained around the bottom of it, which can get messy and/or wasteful.
Now, i have a TW v3 clearo already, and in addition to the o-ring on the mouthpiece, there is an internal seal inside the neck of the device, which serves to provide a secondary seal, and also to keep the mouthpiece clean when removing. My innokin, and two others my friends have, do not have this internal seal. However, the instructions for filling it mention the internal seal.

So my question is this- is the innokin supposed to have this seal and we've just got a duff/fake batch? Or is this seal missing and hence the filling instructions are wrong?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread