The singular future? Extraordinarily highly doubtful. It is without a doubt one facet of the future of vaping, however. Pandora's box is wide open, and nothing's going back inside.
I don't think there's anything wrong with it, as long as it's done semi-intelligently, and more importantly, cautiously.
I'm still sitting on an ego/clearo, but I'll be dipping my toe into the rebuildable waters tomorrow. I'm sure at some point down the road I'll look into a fun cloudy setup for wild hairs, but I don't anticipate it being my personal norm.
It is a huge buzzword at the moment, I'll give you that, but I don't think there's any reason to expect it to become synonymous with vaping.
I agree with everything you said up until the last statement.
The ANTZ will use every means at their disposal to "dispose" of smoking. (And to them vaping
is smoking).
To expect them not to use every possible tool in their arsenal to get their way underestimates them.
These are the same folks that got the FLAVOR ban on cigarettes (because they said it would attract kids to smoking)
written into law.
That law is the same one that appointed oversight of ecigs to the FDA.
Some people refer to that law as the Tobacco Act of 2009 but it is important to know the full, actual name of that law:
The FAMILY SMOKING PREVENTION and Tobacco CONTROL Act of 2009.
The opponents of vaping are "attacking" vaping from the standpoint of prevention and elimination not smoking cessation. While the vaping community primarily (at least originally) was coming from the standpoint of a safer alternative for smokers.
This is a problem because it means from the outset our purposes are at odds.
This is David and Goliath and Goliath is an army: Lawmakers, Big Tobacco, Big Pharm, Media
They will paint "cloud chasing" as a fad or a sport that attracts youth to vaping and vaping is a gateway to smoking and nicotine addiction.
If you don't believe this then I invite you to actually read the Tobacco Act and the FDA proposed deeming regs at minimum because their perspective is spelled out
clearly
In other words,
they will MAKE IT synonymous with vaping.
Think about the headlines that would have occurred had the explosion at VapeBlast maimed or killed.
You can bet your ..... it would have been something like:
" X PEOPLE KILLED WHEN ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE EXPLODES DURING "CLOUD CHASING" COMPETITION AT VAPE EVENT"
BTW I have nothing against cloud chasing--the genie is out of the bottle anyway--but I am a realist.
"If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles.
If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat.
If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle"
-Sun Tzu