Been doing research and here's what I found, Moderators please sticky if possible.
[h=1]Conspiracy to Kill: Governments and Public Health Campaigners[/h]
[h=2]Supression of Alternative Smoking Products Will Kill Millions[/h] [h=2][/h] We believe there is a conspiracy, not just against electronic cigarettes but against all forms of alternative smoking.
Saving lives:
According to the Tobacco Harm Reduction project alternatives to smoking such as smokeless tobacco and e-cigarettes reduce the risks of dying from a smoking-related diseases by 95%.
Less harmful:
Smokers Only states:
Smoking efficiently delivers nicotine, an addictive drug producing many pleasurable effects. But nicotine does not cause cancer, heart attacks or emphysema. Those illnesses are caused by the other 3000 products of tobacco combustion.
Safety
In a Safety Report on the Electronic Cigarette, Dr Murray Laugeson of Health New Zealand states that electronic cigarettes are;
"...very safe relative to cigarettes, and also safe in absolute terms on all measurements we have applied."
Living in a dreamworld:
Despite the existence of healthier options, Health Campaigners seem to insist that smokers either give up or die. The truth of the matter is that many of us cant or dont want to.
In Killing By The Million Clive Bates, former director of AshUk, argues that:
Instead of telling the truth about low risk options, there is a conspiracy to lie and mislead (for example, the US Surgeon General told a barefaced lie about it to Congress).
Supressing information:
Google refuses to run ads for the E-Cigarette. tobacco Harm Reduction states that there is a deliberate spread of misinformation. Lies are told in the US congress. The E-cigarette is banned in Australia. In the UK e-cigarette companies are forced to remove genuine testimonials from customers.
Revenue:
Revenue from smoking still far outstrips the cost of treating smoking diseases - smoking diseases cost nearly 3 billion but the government raises about 10 billion yearly from smoking revenues. And of course, if everyone gave up smoking traditional cigarettes, the government would still have to pay for the diseases built up after years of traditional smoking - but without the sin tax they levy on smokers.
Is it a conspiracy? You decide!
[h=1]Conspiracy to Kill: Governments and Public Health Campaigners[/h]
Saving lives:
According to the Tobacco Harm Reduction project alternatives to smoking such as smokeless tobacco and e-cigarettes reduce the risks of dying from a smoking-related diseases by 95%.
Less harmful:
Smokers Only states:
Smoking efficiently delivers nicotine, an addictive drug producing many pleasurable effects. But nicotine does not cause cancer, heart attacks or emphysema. Those illnesses are caused by the other 3000 products of tobacco combustion.
Safety
In a Safety Report on the Electronic Cigarette, Dr Murray Laugeson of Health New Zealand states that electronic cigarettes are;
"...very safe relative to cigarettes, and also safe in absolute terms on all measurements we have applied."
Living in a dreamworld:
Despite the existence of healthier options, Health Campaigners seem to insist that smokers either give up or die. The truth of the matter is that many of us cant or dont want to.
In Killing By The Million Clive Bates, former director of AshUk, argues that:
Instead of telling the truth about low risk options, there is a conspiracy to lie and mislead (for example, the US Surgeon General told a barefaced lie about it to Congress).
Supressing information:
Google refuses to run ads for the E-Cigarette. tobacco Harm Reduction states that there is a deliberate spread of misinformation. Lies are told in the US congress. The E-cigarette is banned in Australia. In the UK e-cigarette companies are forced to remove genuine testimonials from customers.
Revenue:
Revenue from smoking still far outstrips the cost of treating smoking diseases - smoking diseases cost nearly 3 billion but the government raises about 10 billion yearly from smoking revenues. And of course, if everyone gave up smoking traditional cigarettes, the government would still have to pay for the diseases built up after years of traditional smoking - but without the sin tax they levy on smokers.
Is it a conspiracy? You decide!
