Go to an Ohms law calculator (you can download an app or go to a website) and start plugging in numbers and see what happens.
Truth be told with APVs (especially when using a rba) VW is practically meaningless.
The performance differences from one RBA to another coupled with the different power range "sweet spots" that are all over the place depending on your build defeat the advantages of VW.
The chief advantage of VW made
sense for cartos and clearos. With cartos and clearos you are dealing with a relatively limited range of resistance (ohms) that don't have a horribly different ability to draw in air, so the idea was (hypothetically) take your MVP and set it to 100 and then you could use your 2.4ohm carto or 1.8ohm clearo and the performance was pretty comparable.
The idea was set it and forget it.
Not going to work with the advanced modern stuff.
Let's say I have a typical cloud chaser RBA with TONS of airflow with a .4ohm coil in it.
This build should easily run 40w no problem. Depending on the build and particular Rba it may actually even be a little cold at 40w.
Now on the other hand let's say I have a Kayfun with a 1.4 ohm coil. At 40w you will get nothing but burned wick.
So the "set it and forget it" won't work here.
However, if we have a VV APV set to 4v, no problem with the example I gave. The rba would still fire at 40w and the Kayfun would be at a much more reasonable 11w.
So I would actually argue for advanced users VV alone would actually be more beneficial.
However EVOLV (creators of the
dna chip set found in a lot of the popular APVs) created a new bench mark when they introduced VW and most other companies have followed suit