Vwls' Review: 3D Dimmi's Dream Dripper by Atmomixani

Status
Not open for further replies.

Vwls

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 22, 2013
1,704
4,605
AZ
Prelude
I was very excited about this atty because I vape in the neighborhood of .4 to .5 ohms with cotton, and once you discover the amazing, satisfying vapor production at this level, you really can never go back. Rebuilding, lowering resistance, and wicking with cotton is what made me fall in love with vaping – it’s also what enabled me to cut my nicotine down to 2 mg (often, zero). But there’s a problem that comes with this delightful vaping style; sub ohming in a dripper greatly reduces one’s atomizer choices. Yes, you need to be able to wrap and wick coils, but in order to get them to perform, you need the right kind of air flow. The best coil in the world won't produce without the right amount of air.

One thing’s for certain – you will find yourself in a precarious position when it comes to RDA-vaping and driving. We all know it’s not safe to juice up your wick while behind the wheel. Bottom feeding mods built to handle sub ohm vaping have been to date the only solution to prevent the dreaded “dripping and driving” syndrome, while still producing billowing clouds.

With this in mind, I was eager to try an atomizer that offered an RDA design with adjustable air flow, and a tank underneath that could be utilized on a tube mod. The idea is that when clicked, the 3D will shoot liquid up through a hole in the deck to be absorbed by the wick, and then suck the excess back down to the lower reservoir so there is no leakage from the upper quadrant.

3d-dimmis-dream-dripper_zps5d4cf07d.jpg


Aesthetics
Although I was not overly pleased with the 3D’s logo (it’s definitely not up to the standards Atmomixani has set with its other product engravings), I must admit the 3D looks somewhat shmexy on a Nemmy (especially the two-tone Kalafan) and the look is enhanced by the native hybrid connection. Unfortunately, the logos do not line up well when all sections are secured to optimal tightness. I can live with that, but it’s something I feel should have been engineered with more care considering the price point.

3Dexterior3_zpsd9b86b9b.jpg


Build
I started my adventure by installing dual coils in the 3D. It’s not the easiest atty to rebuild – especially with thicker wire configurations. Prepare to go through a bit of struggle to capture your coil legs properly between screw and post. Atmomixani should have given us post holes in an atty this innovative (and pricey). Note: once installed, be careful not to push the moveable deck down and turn the fill hole too much – it will rotate the pos post and pull your coils out of shape.

3Ddualwicked_zps8858ff43.jpg


The atty vapes fine in dual mode, but I prefer a single coil. Happily, the air flow control ring allows you to choose. As an aside, I did open up the atty’s largest air hole in single coil mode to 3/32” on both the cap and the ring; but it was super easy to do and I’m very happy with the results. I like the way the 3D’s air flow control ring locks into place so you can “set it and forget it.”

Single coil mode: drill-twisted 26 gauge, 8 wraps on a 3/32” precision screwdriver (.5 ohms)
3Dsingle_zpse2b54b1c.jpg


3Dsinglelit_zps1c73d041.jpg


3Dsinglewicked_zps4142e27e.jpg


3Dsinglewickedwet_zpsfed4d38f.jpg


Filling
It’s a shame this doesn’t hold more than a mil and a half of juice, as that would never last a full day. But I was not as concerned with that as I was the difficulty of getting the juice IN.

It’s not easy to get that lower tank area filled without a needle nosed bottle or hypodermic. I tried filling the top sector and then clicking the device to suck the juice down into the lower sector (see Todd's Reviews), but this did not work for me. Not sure if it’s because my juice is thick (100% VG), or if it’s just a flaw in the design, but the juice stays pooled up in the top sector rather than getting sucked down to the lower reservoir. I finally found a juice bottle that had a tip that fit.

3Dfill_zps1e00c507.jpg


Final Thoughts
I like the 3D and it’s working for me in the car. It vapes well: good flavor – stellar vapor production. Holds about 3 mils altogether if you wick with cotton. Does “squonk” the liquid up to the wick as promised when you click the device. (Does NOT suck the liquid back down as well as I would like; maybe someone with a higher PG ratio juice can weigh in on this, as I suspect the viscosity of my juice may be causing the problem.) Is it worth $150? Probably. We’re paying in the hundred dollar range or more for RDAs that do far less, so why not shell out the extra for one that squonks and can turn your tube mod into a dripper with a tank. Atmomixani should offer the 3D with a needle-nosed bottle of some sort at no extra charge, and as mentioned, they should put holes in the posts or offer it as an option. (Maybe a logo re-design if they really want to go the extra mile - they could hold a contest and allow their fans and customers to enter logo ideas.) But all in all, a pretty nifty little atty from a company that continues to innovate and push the vaping envelope.

3Dinthegarden_zps4df5101b.jpg
 

Vwls

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 22, 2013
1,704
4,605
AZ
Final thoughts on the 3D:

Positives:
1) True dripper experience with all the airflow you need for any type of coil
2) Air holes can be drilled out if you want to (unlike Kayfun/Spheroid style atties)
3) Does "squank" or push the juice up to the wick and coil from the nether-tank as promised
4) Very good flavor - vapor production can be stellar depending on your build
5) Bottom line: this is a REAL dripper with a tank. Perfect for dripping and driving.

Negatives:
1) Ugly logo
2) No post holes
3) The logos don't align. Period. (This becomes less of an issue if you sand the atty down to eliminate Negative #1)
4) Hard to fill lower tank (requires the right hypodermic or a needle-nosed bottle with a VERY long nose - neither are provided by Atmomixani with atty)
5) A bit pricy

Because most of the negatives are less about function than form, this is a hands-down must-own atty for anyone who loves an airy draw, lung hits, or sub ohming. To date no other atomizer offers a true dripper-with-a-tank experience because of the air flow restrictions on the Kayfun/Spheroid family and the drippers-with-filler-material styles like Prometey.

Conclusion: get one.
 
Last edited:

Etherz

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 24, 2014
91
37
United States
I am glad you've had great success with the original. I have the Fasttech clone and it is flawed majorly.

1. It can like through the center post into your mod to the battery. It's the way you have to screw on the three post base onto the center post. Now this maybe only my clone but it happened.

2. Juice tends to creep out of the sides when you pump it. This can happen randomly or if you block the fill hole which leads me to my next con

3.The fill hole will drift. If you're not squeezing it flush the position of the fill hole will rotate around the juice well. I had it on the opposite side of my wick and when juice started to creep out the sides again, I checked and the fill whole was under my wicks.

Now mine is just a clone, but I feel there are too many moving parts for this dripper to be reliable. I think busardo was being nice when he gave it a neutral review and he knows demitri

If you want to drip in the car I recommend just getting a dripper with a big juice well.

Let me say this again mine is a clone. I am sure the original is much better made but the design flaws of a self contained bottom feed dripper shows through if its not done right.
 

Wickeddeuce

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 11, 2013
1,069
2,027
JBLM
Final thoughts on the 3D:

Positives:
1) True dripper experience with all the airflow you need for any type of coil
2) Air holes can be drilled out if you want to (unlike Kayfun/Spheroid style atties)
3) Does "squank" or push the juice up to the wick and coil from the nether-tank as promised
4) Very good flavor - vapor production can be stellar depending on your build
5) Bottom line: this is a REAL dripper with a tank. Perfect for dripping and driving.

Negatives:
1) Ugly logo
2) No post holes
3) The logos don't align. Period. (This becomes less of an issue if you sand the atty down to eliminate Negative #1)
4) Hard to fill lower tank (requires the right hypodermic or a needle-nosed bottle with a VERY long nose - neither are provided by Atmomixani with atty)
5) A bit pricy

Because most of the negatives are less about function than form, this is a hands-down must-own atty for anyone who loves an airy draw, lung hits, or sub ohming. To date no other atomizer offers a true dripper-with-a-tank experience because of the air flow restrictions on the Kayfun/Spheroid family and the drippers-with-filler-material styles like Prometey.

Conclusion: get one.

I appreciate your review, and it is definitely something to consider... but...

now this is just my opinion... you already have something that does the job of dripping on the go... and it should do one hell of a job once you upgrade to the SO kit...

I have barely put mine down...

especially now that it works below .3 ohms, and hits just as hard as everything else i have...
 

Vwls

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 22, 2013
1,704
4,605
AZ
I am glad you've had great success with the original. I have the Fasttech clone and it is flawed majorly.

1. It can like through the center post into your mod to the battery. It's the way you have to screw on the three post base onto the center post. Now this maybe only my clone but it happened.

2. Juice tends to creep out of the sides when you pump it. This can happen randomly or if you block the fill hole which leads me to my next con

3.The fill hole will drift. If you're not squeezing it flush the position of the fill hole will rotate around the juice well. I had it on the opposite side of my wick and when juice started to creep out the sides again, I checked and the fill whole was under my wicks.

Now mine is just a clone, but I feel there are too many moving parts for this dripper to be reliable. I think busardo was being nice when he gave it a neutral review and he knows demitri

If you want to drip in the car I recommend just getting a dripper with a big juice well.

Let me say this again mine is a clone. I am sure the original is much better made but the design flaws of a self contained bottom feed dripper shows through if its not done right.
The thing about clones is, most of the time you do get what you pay for. I sometimes feel it is permissible to buy clones to harvest their parts. But most days I am against it for a number of reasons. For one thing, as you mention, there are often idiosyncrasies caused by cheap materials and little-to-no quality control. For another, there is a definite theft that is occurring of the original designer's innovation, design and research. This troubles me on a moral level much the same as plagiarism does.

All that aside, I will tell you that I have not had problems with leakage inside or juice leaking out of the sides with the authentic 3D. The fill hole does drift as you mention, but not so much as to cause a problem. My review was fair, and I still feel after having this atty for half a year, and using it nearly every day, that it is a worthy purchase. I did end up sanding the tank portion to remove the logo and this has made me like it even better.

inyourhand_zps1d851355.jpg



Coming soon - a review of the new Copper Cyclone with AFC!
 

Vwls

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 22, 2013
1,704
4,605
AZ
I'd like someone to design an atty with the same device inside as the Rocky, but a shorter tank (height-wise), better materials (including Pyrex instead of plastic), and a more compact atomizer section. (And of course eliminate that hideous exterior.) Yes it would hold less liquid, but it would be prettier. Personally, I'm willing to fill a lot more often for pretty. :p :oops:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread