Besides the obvious, a bridge, what is the difference in performance between the two?
What's the difference between bridged and bridgless attys
- Thread starter BigLebowski
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
I think I get more vapor, flavor and throat hit when dripping into a bridgeless.
So it reduces the burnt hits and increases production? Is this just subjective or factual?
The bridge is suposed to hold the juice a little better. I think its easier to flood a bridgless. I use both and like both. The higher end attys like the HH 357 are bridgless so theirs probably something to it.
Last edited:
The only purpose for a bridge is to deliver juice from a cartridge. The bridge would hold some extra juice when dripping, but as far as I'm concerned, the fact that you can't see the coil well for cleaning purposes negates that unintended use benefit.
They are nice its good to have one I like having lots of options. Also a dual coil atty is worth getting and 306 atty are good also especially with a DCA. Just when you thought you had attys figured out now you have some more youtubing to do;-)
O yea forgot about the cartridges man Im glad they were short lived they sucked!
Last edited:
Bridgeless = 3 x more expensive. Buy 3 bridged atomizers. You clean them the same way. "Seeing coil"? Really? Next thing you know, he'll be putting it under a microscope! 
The bridge doesn't "burn". There are wicks of course. Silica. That doesn't burn either. If you're cleaning the atty and not over heating it...nothing burns.
Bridge holds juice. There was even a time when people made "bonuts" for dripping. Do a forum search. They actually added mesh to atomizers. lol.
I used to use standard atomizers. I'm NOT paying $20.00 for some over-hyped atomizers. No way. I tried a bridge-less once. Didn't last any longer and tasted the same. IDK what one it was off the top of my head. But....meh.
The bridge doesn't "burn". There are wicks of course. Silica. That doesn't burn either. If you're cleaning the atty and not over heating it...nothing burns.
Bridge holds juice. There was even a time when people made "bonuts" for dripping. Do a forum search. They actually added mesh to atomizers. lol.
I used to use standard atomizers. I'm NOT paying $20.00 for some over-hyped atomizers. No way. I tried a bridge-less once. Didn't last any longer and tasted the same. IDK what one it was off the top of my head. But....meh.
I find the flavor more muted with bridged atomizers and I also have a very difficult time keeping them in the happy place between too dry and flooded. I tried comparing identical Cisco spec attys, bridged and bridgless, to rule out brand differences. I had the same issues with the Cisco bridged. That said, some people love bridged attys.
Bridgeless = 3 x more expensive. Buy 3 bridged atomizers. You clean them the same way. "Seeing coil"? Really? Next thing you know, he'll be putting it under a microscope!
I find a cheap magnifying glass works just fine.
Depending on vaping style and juice used sometimes a burnt crust will form. Seeing, and maybe I should of added, accessing the coil is necessary to pick that crud off the coil, otherwise it won't taste so good.
Last edited:
I find a cheap magnifying glass works just fine.
A sweet or dark juice with a 50% or above VG would for sure be better off in a bridgless.
ww.goodsensevapor.com/pages/306dca Heres a link there are bridged and bridgless 306 attys also;-) #06 attys are small and easy to flood so a DAC makes it easier to use.
- Status
Similar threads
