When Stan Glantz got rubbished

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jorge22

Super Member
ECF Veteran

Jorge22

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Not the case here. If you read the document you may have noticed that BigT only paid for 5% of the research and that was because there weren't more funds available then to finish it. Not that it's easy for me to accept second-hand smoke doesn't cause cancer etc. But the bottom line is we know who Stan Glantz is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EBates
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread