Your favorite glass RBA tank?
- Thread starter Muggs
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
I am a dripper and love building my own coils to my specifications. Over the last month I have found the Clean tank and have paired it with the diver. This set up is perfect for me when I am traveling and can not risk dripping and driving.
No leaking what so ever-EVER.
Parva One Piece Clean Tank - Avid Vaper
Atmistique Diver
http://www.atmistique.gr/en/mods-re...roduct_id=480&category_id=14&keyword=diver+v2
Do your research and make sure it is something you are willing to do. These require twisting res/nr wires together or purchasing the coils already made.
No leaking what so ever-EVER.
Parva One Piece Clean Tank - Avid Vaper
Atmistique Diver
http://www.atmistique.gr/en/mods-re...roduct_id=480&category_id=14&keyword=diver+v2
Do your research and make sure it is something you are willing to do. These require twisting res/nr wires together or purchasing the coils already made.
The kaufun is where it's at. I don't know if they are available with a glass tank but they do have an all ss option. Also, I recently started rebuilding protanks with cotton wick which has been great!
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
My post was toward rda's and not rba's. Oooops Once you put it into a tank though…………..
I have heard about rebuilding protanks with cotton, that is an option for sure. I use my carto tanks all day, I play with an RBA I have but now that I understand making coils, etc I want to rebuild a tank so I don't have to keep manually dripping.
I heard Smoktech is putting out a glass RSST, that seems the most appealing so far. Trying to stay under $50
I heard Smoktech is putting out a glass RSST, that seems the most appealing so far. Trying to stay under $50
There's a lot to chose from from aga t to high ends like the rsm rocket or doodlebug
I use IBTanked pyrex tanks on my Sophia RBA. IMO, you can spend more, but can't buy a better tank than IBTanked. I feel the same about the Sophia when it comes to RBAs. You can use it tankless as a dripper or tank it as small or as large as you want.
ΣΟΦΙΑ Repairable atomizer for tank.
RBA = ReBuildable Atomizer
RDA = Rebuildable Dripping Atomizer - an RBA designed for dripping
RTA = Rebuildable Tank Atomizer - an RBA integrated onto or into a tank
Tank = a plastic, metal, or glass reservoir which holds liquid for use with an atomizer (including that in a cartomizer)
ΣΟΦΙΑ Repairable atomizer for tank.
RBA = ReBuildable Atomizer
RDA = Rebuildable Dripping Atomizer - an RBA designed for dripping
RTA = Rebuildable Tank Atomizer - an RBA integrated onto or into a tank
Tank = a plastic, metal, or glass reservoir which holds liquid for use with an atomizer (including that in a cartomizer)
Last edited:
Thanks Nico. I agree I love my IBTanked glass tanks. I have a 45mm and a 35mm. That Sophia rebuildable is very very nice. I just watched that video. That's a great way to be able to rebuild while keeping the ease of the carto tanks.
Slightly confused by this!! So if an RDA is for dripping then what would the RBA be used for? If memory serves me correctly the RBA, (Genesis), came before the RDA and had a tank attached to it, (either on top of or under the coil), and is why the, (RTA), you so elegantly described is known, (industry wide), as an RBA. I can see the need to come up with a new classification for a rebuildable such as the Sofia, but it is nothing more than someone converting a cartomizer to an atty to go into a cartomizer tank!!!
The Sophia works well with the 35 mm tank for a shorter solution. All you need is a STR 5 drip tip to finish it off for a 15 mm total height mouthpiece. You can get the same thing, but without a seam, buying the base and the 50 mm long main tube with integrated drip tip, but that's not usable with a 45 mm tank. For the 45 mm tank, you need a straight drip tip at least 10 mm long to be able to adjust the juice control and slide the tank up while keeping it sealed while removing the base. I bought the STR 15 for the 45 mm tanks.
I still use my IBTanked filler tool/drip tip for most filling, but it's easy enough to fill the tank without a tool (just as with a carto). This totally blows away any $2 carto and is real close to the flavor of dripping into a dedicated disposable atty. I only had the Sophia one day before I ordered another. By Leo gear is 10% off until January 7th with code XMAS1314 and shipping is free with 100+ € order.
edit to add: I bought Stormy's Kanthal Ready Wires in 1.8Ω, 1.5Ω, and 1.2Ω. Makes recoiling a cinch. I use organic cotton ball for wick.
Last edited:
RTA is not a well-established acronym yet. RDA is getting there, as vendors and some manufacturers are beginning to use it. RBA is any designed rebuildable atomizer, either tank or dripping. I usually just say "tank RBA" instead of RTA. It's confusing because the original acronym abbreviates "rebuildable" with "RB", where both the newer ones do not. It seems smarter to me if it were "RBD" and "RBT". But hey, I don't make the rules...
Good luck finding a glass RBT that works well for you
. If I were to buy one now, it would be a Fogger V2. For genesis style, I dunno, I have a plastic RSST and I am not a big fan of vertical wicking. The Protank is not a bad option but it isn't a true RBA experience (which can be summarized by enhanced wicking and airflow, allowing much higher wattage).
Last edited:
Pretty much all the vendors I buy from have them classified as either an RBA or RDA. Actually, the majority of them do!! I have read too many horror stories about the Fogger's in general. Very difficult to setup, but once you get it they seem to be a very good device. Same for the Steam Turbine also. I myself am waiting on the new RSST w/ Pyrex tank. I really enjoy the one I have now and really have no need for the Pyrex, but just think it looks a little cleaner. The Protanks shouldn't even be considered an RBA as it is only a glorified clearomizer!! As to all the acronyms flying around, I think it will be quite a while before RTA becomes the standard...
Last edited:
my glass rebuildable tanks include:
AGA-T+
AGT
iAtty
Pulse G replica
BliSS replica
they all perform great with the exception of the BliSS clone which i expect to perform great, but havent had the chance to set it up yet as the screws it came with were just slightly too big. got some new ones now that fit perfectly.
but anyway, they are al great and none of them leak. the trick to avoiding leaks lies in your wick. with a 100% mesh wick, you want it rolled as tightly as possible. another option is ss rope with a bit of mesh up top under the coil. with the right sized rope and with the mesh up top, you'll effectively curb any potential leaking.
AGA-T+
AGT
iAtty
Pulse G replica
BliSS replica
they all perform great with the exception of the BliSS clone which i expect to perform great, but havent had the chance to set it up yet as the screws it came with were just slightly too big. got some new ones now that fit perfectly.
but anyway, they are al great and none of them leak. the trick to avoiding leaks lies in your wick. with a 100% mesh wick, you want it rolled as tightly as possible. another option is ss rope with a bit of mesh up top under the coil. with the right sized rope and with the mesh up top, you'll effectively curb any potential leaking.
OK, now define "rebuildable." Does having a replaceable coil assembly count, or only if you can make your own coil?
Most of the common tanks/clearomizers/??? with replaceable coil assemblies can be rebuild with new coils if you really want to save the $2, although they're not designed to be. I've seen instructions for the bottom coil ones, but even the dual top coil ones are probably possible, but harder.
Most of the common tanks/clearomizers/??? with replaceable coil assemblies can be rebuild with new coils if you really want to save the $2, although they're not designed to be. I've seen instructions for the bottom coil ones, but even the dual top coil ones are probably possible, but harder.
Right. While technically the replaceable coil units are indeed able to be rebuilt, they are not true rebuildables. And in most cases, they're more difficult and certainly more tedious IMO to build.
They are fun to tinker with for users to see if rebuilding is for them, but in the end you don't really get a true rba experience with rebuilds on replaceable coil units.
They are fun to tinker with for users to see if rebuilding is for them, but in the end you don't really get a true rba experience with rebuilds on replaceable coil units.
Why not? They wear out, you rebuild them by replacing parts. Who decided that the parts must only be coils and wicks and o-rings?
@Mike.S
I'm guessing it would be the manufacturers!! They are the ones that made them and distinguished them to be a "replaceable" coil and not a rebuildable. You are correct that they can be rebuilt, but personally, they are the reason I actually bought my first RDA... The instructions you have seen for rebuilding the bottom coil replaceable coils, where did those come from? Just curious, were they from Kanger, Vape Only, iSmoka, Aspire, or any other Clearomizer manufacturer? I don't recall seeing any type of instructions other than a few home made YouTube video's and a couple of forum posts describing how to do it. Again, just curious....
I'm guessing it would be the manufacturers!! They are the ones that made them and distinguished them to be a "replaceable" coil and not a rebuildable. You are correct that they can be rebuilt, but personally, they are the reason I actually bought my first RDA... The instructions you have seen for rebuilding the bottom coil replaceable coils, where did those come from? Just curious, were they from Kanger, Vape Only, iSmoka, Aspire, or any other Clearomizer manufacturer? I don't recall seeing any type of instructions other than a few home made YouTube video's and a couple of forum posts describing how to do it. Again, just curious....
Kanger protanks and evods are not rebuildables.
Even though you can rebuild them.
A rebuildable, is designed from conception to have the user wrap thier own coil using thier own wick and wire.
--------
If your RBA needs to be glass, its probably going to need to be a genesis atomizer. PLENTY to choose from there.
It should be mentioned, that the Kayfun, even though its not glass, is incredibly popular. It can be run with the full stainless tank, or the clear makloron(sp?) tank, which may not be 100% impervious to hardcore juices like cinamon types. I can say two things.. 1) I ran plenty of fruity and citrus type juices through the Kayfun clear tank without issue, and 2)I dont think the kayfun is worth the hype. For all the praise it gets for being a flavor monster, I get much better flavor, AND an overall better vape, off a dripping atomizer than I do the Kayfun. Now, I havent tried the other things similar to the Kayfun, like the Aqua, or the Taifun GT, which might be better off. I personally am really interested in the Footoon Aqua, because it seems like it can handle low ohm builds and still feed lots of juice to the wicks, much more efficiently than the Kayfun can.
Even though you can rebuild them.
A rebuildable, is designed from conception to have the user wrap thier own coil using thier own wick and wire.
--------
If your RBA needs to be glass, its probably going to need to be a genesis atomizer. PLENTY to choose from there.
It should be mentioned, that the Kayfun, even though its not glass, is incredibly popular. It can be run with the full stainless tank, or the clear makloron(sp?) tank, which may not be 100% impervious to hardcore juices like cinamon types. I can say two things.. 1) I ran plenty of fruity and citrus type juices through the Kayfun clear tank without issue, and 2)I dont think the kayfun is worth the hype. For all the praise it gets for being a flavor monster, I get much better flavor, AND an overall better vape, off a dripping atomizer than I do the Kayfun. Now, I havent tried the other things similar to the Kayfun, like the Aqua, or the Taifun GT, which might be better off. I personally am really interested in the Footoon Aqua, because it seems like it can handle low ohm builds and still feed lots of juice to the wicks, much more efficiently than the Kayfun can.
- Status
