It would be easy to respond to all of your points, but why bother. It is all just petty bickering. Just one point though, it is the government we are dealing with, and government procedure. Ignore that and you lose.He was talking about CASAA response. Part of their argument was that we didn't include all forms of THR. Fighting for all of the THR products was not the goal for us in that petition and it was stated as much in the drafting thread.
As for your badly written comment, we did ask for input from ALL ECF members as well as CASAA and only a handful stepped up to help. You weren't one of them. In fact iirc you refused to help at all and condemned us from the beginning.
Now where you get this idea that there is a difference in the petitions is beyond me. All petitions are citizens petitions. This one is only different in the process that is being used to submit it and nothing more.
It's almost as if your saying because the government isn't telling you it's valid then it can't be valid. I think I know you well enough to know you don't believe that but that's how you come across.
Besides that It does show just how bad things have gotten on ECF when it comes to advocacy.
Last edited: