You explained it quite well and I fully understand it. I wrote the rest of it and here is the whole thing. You'll see I incorporated what you said at the end:
It seems nobody can read the actual study, only a brief abstract.
So all we can do is read the abstract to see if it passes the common
sense test. According to the abstract, they asked 15,264 adolescents if they had EVER used e-cigarettes ("lifetime e-cigarette use" is how it's described in the abstract) and also asked if they had recently used conventional cigarettes. Out of all the respondents, 3.2% (488) reported that they "had used e-cigarettes." That is a remarkably low number and hardly supports alarmist claims that adolescents in large numbers are fiendishly puffing on e-cigarettes. Furthermore, It seems they were not asked how recently or how often they had used e-cigarettes, so we have no way of knowing how many just took one puff a few years ago or whether they are, or have ever been, regular users. Of that small group of “ever used,” most if not all were recent smokers of conventional cigarettes. What we’re not told is how many of all the respondents were regular or current conventional cigarette users. Nor are we told how many in that sub-group had ever tried substituting e-cigarettes for conventional cigarettes and, if so, how successful they were. Nor are we told how many in the cigarette smoking group expressed a desire to quit and, if so, by what method. Nor was any attempt made to compare the number of cigarette smokers who had no desire to quit smoking conventional cigarettes with the number of former or current e-cigarette users who likewise had no desire to quit smoking conventional cigarettes. Conversely, the study (judging from the abstract) did not answer this simple but important question: if the very small percentage of former or current e-cigarette “users” did not use it as a smoking cessation aid, WHY did they use them?
So, we’re left with a bare, unsubstantiated conclusion, without even a glimpse at the results which supposedly support it: “E-cigarette use . . . does not appear to be part of a cessation regimen among conventional cigarette smokers wishing to quit.”
Now, let’s compare that with what Dr. Spangler claims the study shows: “Adolescents do not use e-cigarettes as cessation aids, but rather use them in conjunction with conventional cigarettes (58-fold greater risk of use among smokers).”
The study does not support either of Dr. Spangler's claims. If the study had asked all of the current and former conventional cigarette users in this group of 15,264 if they used e-cigarettes for smoking cessation and reported the results, then, depending on the results, Dr. Spangler might have been able to say, “Adolescents do not use e-cigarettes as cessation aids.” But apparently the study didn’t do that and so it provides no support for Dr. Spangler’s "tobacco control" ideology. The study merely showed that 488 adolescents out of a group of 15,264 had at one time or another used an e-cigarette, that some of them were currently smoking conventional cigarettes, and that they had no present desire to quit. Given the fact that they had no present desire to quit, it is hardly surprising that they were not using e-cigarettes as cessation aids. It may also be true that, even though they have no present desire to quit, they may find e-cigarettes more to their liking than conventional cigarettes and simply quit smoking as "unintentional quitters." There are thousands posting on the Electronic Cigarette Forum, in case anybody cares to look.
Contrary to Dr. Spangler's assertion, the study did not measure usage of e-cigarettes “in conjunction with conventional cigarettes.” It merely established that most of the adolescents who had at any time used or tried an e-cigarette, even if they only took one puff, were also recent users of conventional cigarettes and had no present desire to quit.
As for the raw statistical data:
Interpreting odds ratios according to the NIH:
OR=1 Exposure does not affect odds of outcome
OR>1 Exposure associated with higher odds of outcome
OR<1 Exposure associated with lower odds of outcome
In other words, compare the figure they give you to 1. Higher than 1 = higher odds, lower than 1 = lower odds. These are ratios comparing two contrasting variables. You just have to know what the opposite variable is. So for example, in this study:
Female OR is 0.70 => For every 1 male that tries e-cigarettes, 0.7 females do. Or, for every 10 males who try it, 7 females do.
Smoker OR is 58.44 => For every 1 nonsmoker that tries e-cigarettes, 58.44 smokers try it. This is strong evidence that nonsmoking teens have virtually no interest in e-cigarettes.
This study proves what vapers know to be true, and has been shown in other studies: when kids try e-cigarettes, chances are they already smoke.
When they say, "Among conventional cigarette smokers, neither desire to quit nor recent quit attempts is significantly associated with e-cigarette use," they are giving NO data to support this in the abstract, and thus there is no data present to support their conclusion.