Increased price reduces demand. What about anti-smoking ads funded by the FDA and CDC? I am confused as why the governemnt would attempt to collapse itself in relation to cigarettes. Where are your facts? Cigarette consumption has seen a decreasing trend over the years - and its not entirely to vaping. Higher taxes, more ads, more regulation of tobacco companies. It sounds like one big conspiracy.
Do you really think removing the vaping community is going to spike cigarette sales? It may, but it won't be substantial. In the long run, the cigarette industry will collapse in itself. Less and less people of newer generations DONT smoke. And in the long run, smokers will be an extinct species.
The 20% Prevalence Rule means that no matter what is done, smoking will not reduce significantly below 20% unless THR products are freely available. There is no country that breaks the rule (essentially, it states that, in a developed country, if smoking prevalence was originally much higher, then once prevalence drops to 20% it won't go much further no matter what methods are used - unless THR is a factor).
That's about it, basically. We don't know what the future will bring, maybe over time 20PR doesn't hold up, and with a long plateau at 20% or whatever, prevalence can drop slowly over decades. All we know is the current situation: you can't get much below 20% prevalence without THR. For example in the UK it hit rock bottom at 20% in 2008, then stuck there for 5 years until ecigs began to reduce prevalence. The number of smokers actually grew during that time. In the US it looks to be jammed at ~20% minus the percentage who use ST. As there are about 8 million ST (oral tobacco) users according to Brad Rodu, and US smoking prevalence is around 18.5% or thereabouts, maybe what we are seeing is a US smoking prevalence of around 21 or 22% minus the ST users.