I've heard it said that positive pressure is when you blow, and negative pressure is when you suck.
Note 1: That is of course…as you cover the airflow on a tank.
Note 2: Don't work at all for a dripper; but,
Note 3: If you blow the latter, you'll wet your pants.
Good luck. :)
Never used the Nano, but interesting. I'll try and keep an eye open for RBA. Def don't have one right now.
Too many clones, of all the variants.
To be clear the red STM's are/should be sim to the OCC pin config. Those bottom pin insulators are useful. Those of you tossin em when done as don't...
Perhaps you are right that I'm mixing up the ST with the Protank (Aerotank, v3) dual-slot.
The original ST base was a somewhat ample single sided triple-hole arrangement. This takes the orig RBA. For a brief time there was a dual-slot commonly available for it (directly from Kanger). It...
Slightly off-topic but if any of you have some of the v2/v3 single or dual-slot higher airflow bases, for ST or STM, I'd be interested. Even if I have to induce you to part with the whole tank/s. Have quite an assortment but always short bases. I use these for new vapers whenever I have a couple...
Think mebe you're on to something.…Multiwire arcs.
Filed in the scorched early, scorched often, shredded wheat dept.
(Ahh, life was so much simpler when we learned to rebuild.)
Good luck. :)
p.s. Beware end-of-pod-life.
Hear, hear!
We are the parents, gov our petulant child. They have certainly proven it.
Before we dispense with incredulity to extend those who gov our trust…perhaps we should expect them to be able to change their own diapers.
Good luck. :)
Uhhh, let's n̶o̶t̶ tax the rich and just let the man (vaping) behind the tree pay!!!
HOUSE DEMOCRATS BACK OFF TARGETING BILLIONAIRE TAX SCHEMES AND SWAP IN NEW NICOTINE LEVY
Good luck. :|
I found 9mg a comfortable place for awhile on my way to 6. Even smaller increments were useful below this. I ran into sort of wall about 5>4 where I started to get vapers' pimples, i.e zits, or bumpy red sores. Maybe a characteristic of what some believe to be the physiological dependency...
It does make perfect sense if you want to control and tax a natural nutritional as if it were a drug without being one…and set that great precedent through radical distortions of the English language and convoluted impossible regulations.
But it's for the kids of course so naturally, good...
Simply another misdirecting CYA moment for the FDA with a flourish of disdain for their trivial earnest antagonists (that'd be us). I give 'em the double-barreled middle digit.
Good luck. :)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.