A.H.A Retraction

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rossum

Eleutheromaniac
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 14, 2013
16,081
105,222
SE PA
Guess who one of the authors of the retracted paper was?

Yeah, that's right. This guy.

fGwtv4S.jpg
 

MLEJ

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 14, 2020
1,075
2,325
At least now the 6 people who read National Review know the truth.

"I am no longer convinced that establishment science follows the data wherever it leads regardless of the conclusion reached. Too often in areas of cultural or political controversies, there are other agendas at play." <-- Truer words...
 

r77r7r

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
  • Feb 15, 2011
    13,640
    22,585
    Pa,LandOfTaxes
    At least now the 6 people who read National Review know the truth.

    "I am no longer convinced that establishment science follows the data wherever it leads regardless of the conclusion reached. Too often in areas of cultural or political controversies, there are other agendas at play." <-- Truer words...
    It was taken from here though. Is Reuters wider known?
    Columns | Reuters.com
     
    • Optimistic
    Reactions: stols001
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users who are viewing this thread