Anti-Smoking Freaks.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Check out this article from the Dallas Morning News... Absolutely unbelievable. I vote to throw them out of court but amazingly, they actually forced the neighbor to move, but that's still not good enough. This is why I cannot bear so many nonsmokers. Self righteous idiots. Imagine, donning full gas masks. Can these people possibly have any friends???

Dallas woman fuming over smoking neighbor at complex | News for Dallas, Texas | Dallas Morning News | Latest News

[SIZE=+2]Dallas woman fuming over smoking neighbor at complex

[/SIZE] [SIZE=-1]01:46 PM CDT on Wednesday, September 30, 2009

[/SIZE] [SIZE=-1]By SCOTT FARWELL / The Dallas Morning News
sfarwell@dallasnews.com
[/SIZE] In an age when smoking has been outlawed in most public places – government buildings, bars and pool halls – a person's home is one of the few places you can puff in peace.
0930dnsmoking-large.jpg
JOHN F. RHODES / DMN
Cary Daniel and her mother Chris Daniel no longer live in the townhome, and said they need to wear respirators and goggles when they return to the townhome to retreive their belongings. View larger More photos Photo store


Until now.
A Dallas woman has filed a lawsuit seeking six figures from a former neighbor and landlord for damage she says was caused by cigarette smoke wafting through adjoining walls of her high-end townhome.
Also Online
Link: Read more on Texas Fair Housing Act
Health-related coverage
Get more community coverage


"Smoking is not a right, it's a privilege," said Chris Daniel, a retired nurse. "I'm sorry that people smoke. I think it's foolish, but when it comes into my house and hurts my health and my daughter's health and our belongings, it's a different issue."
The case is being watched by townhouse industry groups across the area.
A manager and attorney for Estancia Townhomes, a 52-building community near Prestonwood Country Club in North Dallas, said it's unlikely the Daniels sustained any smoke damage. There is a solid, two-hour fire wall from the foundation to the roof between each of the homes.
And even if some smell did seep through, the Daniels renewed their lease at Estancia – where smoking is permitted – six months after they say the problem began.
"Why do people file lawsuits?" asked Ginger Tye, an attorney representing the property managers and owners. "They're asking for money damages."
The next-door smoker, Rebecca Williams, declined comment.
Chris Daniel and her daughter, Cary, say in the lawsuit that a construction defect is allowing smoke to migrate between the units.
After a year of stinging eyes, breathing difficulty and sinus pain, they moved out of Estancia and into the Homewood Suites in Addison. Last week, movers wearing surgical masks loaded trucks with their belongings.
The Daniels said furniture will need to be reupholstered, artwork restored and closets full of clothing dry cleaned. The bills are still piling up.
"There's nothing in our home that was ready made. I picked out fabrics, everything was custom made and everything was spotless," said Chris Daniel.
"It's not like our worldly goods are the most important things in our life, but you know what? I don't expect them to be damaged."
Some multifamily communities have followed the lead of hotels and car-rental companies – designating nonsmoking rooms or buildings. The Glass House, a 21-story high-rise in Dallas' Uptown, markets itself as a smoke-free property.

Unfamiliar territory

Kathy Carlton, director of government affairs for the Apartment Association of Greater Dallas, said she's never heard of a case such as the one filed by the Daniels.
She said most people who are highly sensitive to cigarette smoke don't move into a community or a building where it's allowed.
"Generally, this stuff is the property owners' prerogative, and people either live by the rules or move on down the street," Carlton said.
"If you have a pet, you look for a place that takes pets. If you hate pets, you look for a place that doesn't allow them. People have choices."
The Daniels said the freedom to choose cuts both ways.
Yes, people may be entitled to smoke in their home – but others are equally entitled to live in a clean and healthy environment.
The right to swing your fist, they said, ends when it meets my nose.
"This lease says I have a right to a habitable place, this lease says I have a right to quiet enjoyment, this lease says I have a right to safe living," said Chris Daniel, referring to court documents.
"And I did have that ... until someone moved in who did not care about her neighbor."
The Daniels lived at Estancia for four years. Today, after a final walkthrough of their home with an attorney and managers, they will hand over the keys.
Nicole Lott, property director at Estancia, said it's been a long year of acrimony.
Managers replaced air filters repeatedly, installed sealant-type electrical plates and – at the Daniels' request – used an industrial-grade roofing sealant to caulk pipes under their kitchen cabinet.
When that didn't work, managers tried to negotiate a move for both tenants within the community.

Restraining order

Williams, the smoker, finally moved to another unit in June after a judge issued a temporary restraining order forbidding her from lighting up in her home.
"We've done more for these people than we've ever done for anyone else," Lott said. "I don't think it's possible to satisfy them."
Chris Daniel also filed a complaint under the Texas Fair Housing Act, alleging that her sensitivity to cigarette smoke qualifies her for protection set aside for people with disabilities.
The complaint is being reviewed by Dallas' Fair Housing Office.
First Assistant City Attorney Chris Bowers said a garden-variety reaction to cigarette smoke – puffy eyes, runny nose, coughing – would probably not meet the standard set by the law, a severe limitation of a major life activity.
"Not just anybody will be able to say smoking has that effect, and that's one of the things our Fair Housing Office will investigate," he said.
"It's safe to say most people do not suffer the degree of impairment this person alleges from cigarette smoke."
Chris Daniel has been treated by an allergist and an internist, according to court records, and was prescribed two inhalers.
Dr. Barbara Stark Baxter, a clinical associate professor at UT Southwestern Medical Center, wrote that Daniels "qualifies as disabled under the Texas Fair Housing Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act."
Her attorney, John Clark Long V, said his clients were essentially driven from their home by cigarette smoke.
He illustrated the case this way:
"It was like living life in an ashtray you can never clean."
 

RenaissancePuffer

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
I'm starting to think that these anti-smokers aren't really anti-smokers, they are just power hungry people looking to dominate minorities to get their jolly's.

Seriously, this is ridiculous. I don't smoke, and the smell of cigarettes is not appealing to me, but I'm not going to ruin someone's life over it. :nah:
 

nyabzns

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 26, 2009
602
142
55
Midwest , USA
It's like people who move next to an airport then sue due to the noise. Can we say IDIOTS?

Locally some years ago we had a lady purchase some property and a home right next to a local asphault race track that has been here for years.

She sued the track owners and town seeking to shut them down or issue a curfew on Saturday night.

A judge with common sense ruled that if you move next door to a racetrack you are going to inevitably hear some loud noise.


You can't fix stupid and obviously agenda's replace common sense these days.
 

PlanetScribbles

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 3, 2009
1,046
124
Londinium, Brittania
Williams, the smoker, finally moved to another unit in June after a judge issued a temporary restraining order forbidding her from lighting up in her home.

Wow, I'll be interested if this ridiculous order is upheld.

What a total overbearing ....h this woman must be

I don't blame the woman, I blame the ... of a justice system that would agree with the woman's complaint. She is merely playing a messed up system.
You may as well tear up your bill of rights. It no longer applies.
 

lkim65

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 24, 2009
125
2
California
This is exactly the reason we bought 10 acres 20 miles from town with no neighbors. We do whatever we want and no one bothers us. What's next? Suing someone who stops at a red light next to you and is smoking?

Actually, a city in California has/was considering just that. Banning people in cars from smoking within 2 ft. of another vehicle or something like that!
 

SheerLuckHolmes

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 28, 2009
1,354
562
73
Tempe, Az
I live 16 miles from a race track and on Sat nights I can hear the noise like it is a couple of blocks over. How anyone can live closer is beyond me. At first I thought is was kids street racing, called the cops and they told me it was the race track. 16 miles!!!!!! WOW!

As to the smoking neighbors the smoke wasn't getting into the non smoking home. It was getting into the non-smoker's head. As soon as she saw her neighobr with a ....... that was all she needed to start fixating on it. When I used to smoke I had women (I have never been taken to task for smoking by another guy) read me the riot act about smoking and the smell and....... But the thing that amazed me was that most of those women, you could smell THEIR perfum from a 100 yards. And they were telling me I stank.

Another thing that amazes me is that I never hear anything about industrial pollution anymore. Or the pollution of big trucks, little trucks, automobiles, etc. etc. etc. It seems that it is only the smoker that is the villian. Amazing, simply amazing!
 

angelique510

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
I'm starting to think that these anti-smokers aren't really anti-smokers, they are just power hungry people looking to dominate minorities to get their jolly's.

So much more polite than I would have worded the sentiment, RenaissancePuffer.

What about people who wear so much perfume it causes migraines? Or people that haven't bathed in the past week and make you gag? We couldn't possibly make laws against them. It might offend somebody.

Can we just outlaw stupid people? No, that would never work...too much paperwork.....

What boggles me is that these so called "liberals" are the ones taking away our liberty. They work so very hard to protect me from myself.

We have to go to townhalls, teaparties, and above all, VOTE these idiots and those who support them out of office. It is turning into a Brave New World.

Be well,
~A
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread