Just wondering if anyone that tried these is having a good experience. I ordered a bunch of these because of their price and so far all I get out of them is a weak, flavorless vapor with little throat hit. I'm using a SI volt battery automatic (which the website says they are designed for). I feel like I have to puff hard to get a good vape and even then the flavor is not all there. I want something to use on my small auto batteries to replace cartomizers, but everything i try sucks. CE3's are so random with how they are going to work and these nano's are just weak. I find it hard to believe that there isnt something out there with good reliability that people use. Why does this have to be such a hassle?
Anyone tried SI Nano Clearomizers?
- Thread starter Bob92985
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
I haven't tried the Nano because of all the mixed reviews, but I did go through the 808 clearomizer thread here and decided to give the Kanger M3s a shot...best money I have spent on vaping so far. I'm really happy with these...no leaks, good flavor, I'm vaping on one right now that I bought about a month ago (also using an SI auto bat) and it is still working as well as it did on day one. They aren't the sturdiest of clearos, but for at home use (or if you're really careful with your stuff) they can't be beat (IMO!!!).
I got mine from VaporKings, but if you google it a few other places also sell them.
I got mine from VaporKings, but if you google it a few other places also sell them.
Kanger M3 sold individually.
Tidy 10, but they do require syringes.
808 Bottom Coil are out of stock, but I do have experience with them. They work well, but the atomizer floods with every fill requiring them to be blown out. They look identical to the M3, but there's no wick.
Tidy 10, but they do require syringes.
808 Bottom Coil are out of stock, but I do have experience with them. They work well, but the atomizer floods with every fill requiring them to be blown out. They look identical to the M3, but there's no wick.
I'm just here to chime in that the Innokin Tidy series (10 or 12) does not need syringes to fill. Just pop up the top cap and fill up.
Although it DOES need some twiddling sometimes for it to perform 100%. Oh, and if you get unlucky you might get one that leaks like a sieve - the QC on these things aren't exactly stellar.
Although it DOES need some twiddling sometimes for it to perform 100%. Oh, and if you get unlucky you might get one that leaks like a sieve - the QC on these things aren't exactly stellar.
I wanted to try a decent clearomizer to get one that can easily clean to try different flavors. The Tidy 10 at 5 for $11 shipped seem like a bargain. Hope they do not leak!
I'm glad you posted this here...report back and let us know how they work. The price is so good, I'm tempted to try them too. Maybe if the M3s I have ever stop working.
Yes, please let us know. Though I definitely want to get some M3's soon.
Though the one Nano I have is doing okay so far, but it's only day 2 with it. If it keeps up for a good week or two (I've already refilled it 4 times), then I'll probably order more of those as well.
Though the one Nano I have is doing okay so far, but it's only day 2 with it. If it keeps up for a good week or two (I've already refilled it 4 times), then I'll probably order more of those as well.
I'm sorry to report that I picked up some clearos and a bunch of blank carts in the classifieds listing, and so I emailed to cancel that order. Sorry!
Don't get me wrong. The tidy sure ain't perfect but it's the ONLY clearo I use on the K8s. Over iTurbos and M3s and whatnot.
It vapes great... if you can take a second to twiddle with it for every hour of vaping. Zero filler or plastic taste. Plus the tube is made from polypropylene, so it's been pretty resistant to breaking or etching so far.
But it does tend to scorch some of the more delicate tasting juices, prolly because it's rated at 2.3 ohms. Also while it burns hot and gives me wonderful clouds of vape, I'm pretty sure it's killing my batteries slowly and surely.
For what it's worth, I ordered one on impulse without reading any reviews beforehand. I only tried it a couple of days ago. I've been using it exclusively ever since. Haven't had a leak as others have reported and I find the taste and vapour is much better than the SI cartomisers. That said, I am using a manual battery with it.
I like it so much, I've added 20 to an order I placed yesterday. Perhaps I got lucky and got a good one, but I reckon the nano is much better than the cartomisers... at this stage. I've already re-filled it about five times (absolutely hammering through my juice) with different flavoured juices and haven't had any issues with any of them. They all taste much stronger than the cartomisers to me. Maybe they work better with the manual battery?
Have you tried them on other 808's or only SI's 808's. The reason I ask is because my SI cartos don't work well on other 808 batteries.
That's good to know. I've used the Kanger 808s with SI batts ok. Maybe the Kanger 808s are a better generic 808 fit? They don"t work well on auto batts I found, but good with manuals.
I myself am still throwing around the idea of getting a Kanger M3 myself, I'll eventually try the nano if I can find one. Might peak and tweak it to see what I can push it to. I've a bad habbit of modding stuff, comes from the days where the only thing avalible was 510 bridged atomizers, eGo, CE2's or carto's...ahh the good ole days.
I am ordering the tidy cart from Health Cabin now, because of the sale... so maybe next time.
Last edited:
Hopefully soon will get the skinny down on cartomizers and clearomizers...so many selections and so few to choose from.
Last edited:
Hum, maybe an Odysseus atomizer will work....looking in to that as annnnn ouuuuch expensive but viable alternative. le sigh.
Last edited:
I picked up some barely used V2 auto batts in the classifieds here and have been using them with my SI cartos and it is working just fine.
- Status
Similar threads
