Beat the clock sale!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.

slim66

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 16, 2010
891
18
USA
from http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/vapor4life/180936-beat-clock-sale-2.html#post3063178
There is nothing "disparaging" about referring to a user of Bloog products as a "Blooger": indeed, I myself qualify as one. By the same token, I am also a "V4Ler." Again, no disparagement. Simply product-user short-hand. I'm afraid you have an overactive imagination.

from http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/vapor4life/180825-partial-shipments-2.html#post3064093
EleanorR said:
I'm sorry, I fail to understand this odd sensitivity/objection to a common form of consumer identification. Perhaps you don't like the B Company's name? Well, there's nothing I can do about that. Their company, their name. (I agree that the substitution of "booger" is kind of obnoxious, and I never do it, even though analog finds it funny -- must be a guy thing, kinda like fart jokes.)

Eleanor, as you said, “context is a very important thing.” Let’s look at the context in which you called two posters a Blooger.


From http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/vapor4life/180936-beat-clock-sale.html#post3048497
Joyce, Kee, please don't feed the troll.
He is yet another Blooger (you know, the juiceless guys) who has a point about a handful of juices but otherwise clearly prefers calumny to accuracy.
Wily, check out the other 100 juices or so that are in stock, why dontcha?:lol:

from http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/vapor4life/180825-partial-shipments.html#post3048303
EleanorR said:
Attention everyone: This thread is a punk
Jayvap is a devout Blooger whose post appears to be not only factually incorrect but darn-near impossible, based on the live-inventory system.

Thankfully, all it really did was highlight what fantastic, up-front and non-shady service and CS V4L has, what with super-fast shipping, immediate account credits and/or super-generous substitutes etc.

Thanks, Jayvap! Now, can we stop with the childish games?

EDIT: I see that as of now, one day later, the OP has been edited to be less inflammatory and accusatory. Good.

In light of the context (the use of the labels “punk” and “troll” immediately before calling the poster a Blooger), it is reasonable to think that many would interpret this as using the term Blooger with a disparaging implication.

The term Blooger in general is terrific, as is V4Ler. As you said, it's the context that is important, and I think that makes all the difference in how others react to the use of the term.

Your quote from http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/vapor4life/180825-partial-shipments-2.html#post3064093
EleanorR said:
As for your inability to apologize for false insinuations . . . I'll live. Quite happily. You're just another member of the species, revealing a not uncommon inability to simply admit she was wrong.

I will gladly admit to anything I said that was wrong, or apologize for any false insinuations, if you will let me know what I said that you feel was wrong or a false insinuation. Here is the quote you were referring to:

From http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/fo...63749-sorry-please-ignore-60.html#post3054770
I can understand that it would not be an easy task to defend a “Booger” over on the riV4L sub-forum.

I wanted to post something there myself, just to clarify a couple of inaccurate statements, but was concerned I’d be considered just another “punk”. I'll just post them here for my own amusement.

Below is a link to a post commenting about wilydodger, someone who has a total of 9 posts, not one of them in the Bloog sub-forum. They called him “yet another Blooger”.
http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/vapor4life/180936-beat-clock-sale.html#post3048497
I have not seen a correction regarding that inaccurate statement in that thread.

The second link is to a comment about jayvap33:
http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/vapor4life/180825-partial-shipments.html#post3048303
jayvap is said to be “a devout Blooger”. However jayvap later commented himself that he is in fact a rep for Bloog and V4L, as well as other e-cig companies.

If you are referring to my saying that it was inaccurate to call wilydodger a Blooger, I have already said I felt it would have been accurate to call him a Blooger and a V4Ler. The omission (even unintentionally) of V4Ler, especially in that context, seemed inaccurate to me, and still does.

Here is my response to your post in the Bloog sub-forum, which I am quoting to emphasize that most of us are Bloogers and V4Lers and it's all good. :vapor:

from http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/fo...63749-sorry-please-ignore-63.html#post3063909
Hey Eleanor, I won't repeat myself here, you probably already saw my response to you in this thread: http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/vapor4life/180825-partial-shipments-2.html#post3063796

I do find it truly confusing about the inconsistency with the editing notification. You edited your post here just a few minutes later and it is noted. That is what happens with most of my edits unless I edit something within a minute or two of posting. So as I said in my response to Keelalagirl's nice response to my question (the first to respond), I don't know how it works when you edit a thread you started.

And I agree, it isn't necessary for either of us to address every error or omission. And you are right, Analog is great, and so is Keelalagirl, Gardner, Morandir, Starsong, Clover, etc........ Most of us are Bloogers and V4Lers and it's all good. :vapor:
 
Last edited:

Gardner808

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 1, 2011
1,065
84
GA
EDIT: This thread is funny too, but the REALLY funny one (with analog, et al. chiming in) is the "Punk Watch" thread, wherein I unfortunately got this whole ball rolling . . . It's a Must Read!

:facepalm: Oh my God. You got me. I can't believe I feed a troll. You, Madam, are the most subtle and insidious one I have ever met. Kudos to you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread