Berkeley considering e-cig ban!

Status
Not open for further replies.

SFBrianT

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 20, 2013
270
194
San Francisco
TODAY THERE WILL BE A HEARING THAT COULD POTENTIALLY TAKE AWAY YOUR RIGHTS!
TODAY SEPT 10TH
Councilmember, City of Berkeley, District 7
2180 Milvia Street, 5th
Floor, Berkeley, CA 94704
PHONE 510-981-7170 FAX 510-981-7177
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Councilmember Kriss Worthington
Subject: Refer Electronic Cigarette Sale and Use to the Health Commission to
Consider Health Policy
RECOMMENDATION
Refer e-cigarette use to the Health Commission and request that they return to the
Council with a recommendation on whether or not to restrict the sale and use of nicotine
and non-nicotine e-cigarettes.
BACKGROUND
Electronic cigarettes (also known as “vapes”) are devices that release either a nicotine
or non-nicotine vaporized solution. E-cigarettes are advertised as a “safe” option to
traditional smoking, and are, for the most part, unregulated.
Despite the claim that e-cigarettes are “harmless to those around you,” there is still
much research needed to confirm this assertion. With the option of a nicotine vapor, ecigarettes
present a possible danger to users and those exposed, as nicotine can have
a negative effect on the heart and circulatory system.
Manufacturers are not mandated to disclose the ingredients in e-cigarette liquid or the
substances that make up e-cigarette vapor. E-cigarettes generally work by heating
cartridges filled with chemicals, which causes chemical reactions that may form new,
possibly unsafe, compounds. Without full knowledge of the risks e-cigarettes present or
regulations in place, community members may be subjected to harsh chemicals that
can lead to many health issues.
A 2012 study in the journal Indoor Air found that exhaling e-cigarette vapor “releases
measurable amounts of carcinogens and toxins into the air, including nicotine,
formaldehyde, and acetaldehyde”; exposure to these types of compounds may cause
mouth and throat irritation, the most frequently reported side effect among e-cigarette
users. Matt Springer, an associate professor at UCSF in the Division of Cardiology, a
proponent of the need for further e-cigarette research, asked, “Should drug-containing
vapors be allowed in patient care areas and day care centers before the risks are
understood? The sensible answer is no.”
Dr. Neal L. Benowitz of UCSF points out that there are other “potential harms, including
promoting smoking of cigarettes and renormalizing cigarette smoking behaviors.” He
goes on to discuss other potential population harms, including uptake of smoking by
non-smokers, hindering the denormalization of smoking, and a new source of air
pollution, particularly in places with smoke-free policies.
The reinvigoration of advertising is also a main concern because e-cigarette marketing
tends to be geared toward youth by using young models to sell the product as stylish
and desirable. Marketing paired with the availability of e-cigarettes online and in
shopping malls in a variety of flavors, has some public health experts concerned that ecigarettes
could increase nicotine use and addiction for young people. Understanding
the effects of e-cigarette is essential to determining future regulations.
In July 2009, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) publicly discouraged the use
of electronic cigarettes, stating, “They do not contain any health warnings comparable to
FDA-approved nicotine replacement products or conventional cigarettes.” With such a
lack of knowledge regarding electronic cigarettes, it is essential that the Health
Commission conduct research into this issue and how it may affect the residents of
Berkeley.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
None.
CONTACT
Kriss Worthington, Councilmember, 981-7170
Jennifer Welden, Intern, 981-7170
 

WCSR

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 26, 2012
511
576
Earth
"Despite the claim that e-cigarettes are “harmless to those around you,” there is still
much research needed to confirm this assertion. With the option of a nicotine vapor, ecigarettes
present a possible danger to users and those exposed, as nicotine can have
a negative effect on the heart and circulatory system."



As with all things in America... Guilty until proven innocent.




Caffeine also has nasty side effects, but I bet Starbucks isn't under the same proposal in Berserkley.

Applies to caffeine: solution

Along with its needed effects, caffeine may cause some unwanted effects. Although not all of these side effects may occur, if they do occur they may need medical attention.

Check with your doctor as soon as possible if any of the following side effects occur while taking caffeine:

More common
........
dizziness
fast heartbeat
hyperglycemia, including blurred vision, drowsiness, dry mouth, flushed dry skin, fruit-like breath odor, increased urination, ketones in urine, loss of appetite, nausea, stomachache, tiredness, troubled breathing, unusual thirst, or vomiting (in newborn babies)
hypoglycemia, including anxious feeling, blurred vision, cold sweats, confusion, cool pale skin, drowsiness, excessive hunger, fast heartbeat, nausea, nervousness, restless sleep, shakiness, or unusual tiredness or weakness (in newborn babies)
irritability, nervousness, or severe jitters (in newborn babies)
nausea (severe)
tremors
trouble in sleeping
vomiting
Rare
Abdominal or stomach bloating
dehydration
........ (bloody)
unusual tiredness or weakness
Symptoms of overdose
Abdominal or stomach pain
agitation, anxiety, excitement, or restlessness
confusion or delirium
convulsions (seizures)—in acute overdose
dehydration
faster breathing rate
fast or irregular heartbeat
fever
frequent urination
headache
increased sensitivity to touch or pain
irritability
muscle trembling or twitching
nausea and vomiting, sometimes with blood
overextending the body with head and heels bent backward and body bowed forward
painful, swollen abdomen or vomiting (in newborn babies)
ringing or other sounds in ears
seeing flashes of "zig-zag" lights
whole-body tremors (in newborn babies)
Some side effects of caffeine may occur that usually do not need medical attention. These side effects may go away during treatment as your body adjusts to the medicine. Also, your health care professional may be able to tell you about ways to prevent or reduce some of these side effects. Check with your health care professional if any of the following side effects continue or are bothersome or if you have any questions about them:

More common
Nausea (mild)
nervousness or jitters (mild)
After you stop using this medicine, your body may need time to adjust. The length of time this takes depends on the amount of medicine you were using and how long you used it. During this time, check with your doctor if you notice any of the following side effects:

More common
Anxiety
dizziness
headache
irritability
muscle tension
nausea
nervousness
stuffy nose
unusual tiredness
 

stevegmu

Moved On
ECF Veteran
May 10, 2013
11,630
12,348
6992 kilometers from home...
TODAY THERE WILL BE A HEARING THAT COULD POTENTIALLY TAKE AWAY YOUR RIGHTS!
TODAY SEPT 10TH
Councilmember, City of Berkeley, District 7
2180 Milvia Street, 5th
Floor, Berkeley, CA 94704
PHONE 510-981-7170 FAX 510-981-7177
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Councilmember Kriss Worthington
Subject: Refer Electronic Cigarette Sale and Use to the Health Commission to
Consider Health Policy
RECOMMENDATION
Refer e-cigarette use to the Health Commission and request that they return to the
Council with a recommendation on whether or not to restrict the sale and use of nicotine
and non-nicotine e-cigarettes.
BACKGROUND
Electronic cigarettes (also known as “vapes”) are devices that release either a nicotine
or non-nicotine vaporized solution. E-cigarettes are advertised as a “safe” option to
traditional smoking, and are, for the most part, unregulated.
Despite the claim that e-cigarettes are “harmless to those around you,” there is still
much research needed to confirm this assertion. With the option of a nicotine vapor, ecigarettes
present a possible danger to users and those exposed, as nicotine can have
a negative effect on the heart and circulatory system.
Manufacturers are not mandated to disclose the ingredients in e-cigarette liquid or the
substances that make up e-cigarette vapor. E-cigarettes generally work by heating
cartridges filled with chemicals, which causes chemical reactions that may form new,
possibly unsafe, compounds. Without full knowledge of the risks e-cigarettes present or
regulations in place, community members may be subjected to harsh chemicals that
can lead to many health issues.
A 2012 study in the journal Indoor Air found that exhaling e-cigarette vapor “releases
measurable amounts of carcinogens and toxins into the air, including nicotine,
formaldehyde, and acetaldehyde”; exposure to these types of compounds may cause
mouth and throat irritation, the most frequently reported side effect among e-cigarette
users. Matt Springer, an associate professor at UCSF in the Division of Cardiology, a
proponent of the need for further e-cigarette research, asked, “Should drug-containing
vapors be allowed in patient care areas and day care centers before the risks are
understood? The sensible answer is no.”
Dr. Neal L. Benowitz of UCSF points out that there are other “potential harms, including
promoting smoking of cigarettes and renormalizing cigarette smoking behaviors.” He
goes on to discuss other potential population harms, including uptake of smoking by
non-smokers, hindering the denormalization of smoking, and a new source of air
pollution, particularly in places with smoke-free policies.
The reinvigoration of advertising is also a main concern because e-cigarette marketing
tends to be geared toward youth by using young models to sell the product as stylish
and desirable. Marketing paired with the availability of e-cigarettes online and in
shopping malls in a variety of flavors, has some public health experts concerned that ecigarettes
could increase nicotine use and addiction for young people. Understanding
the effects of e-cigarette is essential to determining future regulations.
In July 2009, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) publicly discouraged the use
of electronic cigarettes, stating, “They do not contain any health warnings comparable to
FDA-approved nicotine replacement products or conventional cigarettes.” With such a
lack of knowledge regarding electronic cigarettes, it is essential that the Health
Commission conduct research into this issue and how it may affect the residents of
Berkeley.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
None.
CONTACT
Kriss Worthington, Councilmember, 981-7170
Jennifer Welden, Intern, 981-7170


Is there a link for the source?
 

DC2

Tootie Puffer
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 21, 2009
24,161
40,974
San Diego
What do you expect from an institution in a state that elected the terminator to be the governor.
The first time California tried to screw with electronic cigarettes, the bill passed and The Terminator vetoed it.
As far as I know he is the only person to ever veto any electronic cigarette "ban" attempts.
 

Butters78

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 24, 2012
7,236
10,787
47
San Antonio, Texas, United States
The first time California tried to screw with electronic cigarettes, the bill passed and The Terminator vetoed it.
As far as I know he is the only person to ever veto any electronic cigarette "ban" attempts.

That's awesome and good on Arnold.

Now get to the choppa!
 

Katya

ECF Guru
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 23, 2010
34,804
120,147
SoCal
The first time California tried to screw with electronic cigarettes, the bill passed and The Terminator vetoed it.
As far as I know he is the only person to ever veto any electronic cigarette "ban" attempts.

2202ca75470304ff347209073b44cb2c.png
 

Jaguar07

Carpe Nocturne
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 30, 2013
268
497
Long Beach, California, USA
The most interesting part is that the study showed no measurable pollutants from the e-cig tests. The increases in Formaldehyde and Acetelene, were, by the study, attributed to the presence of the person. NOT the e-cig use. So let's just ban people from Berkeley, it really does seem like the right thing to do in the light of the study.
 

darkstorm

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Nov 16, 2011
419
376
Colorado
www.vaportrailz.com
"Despite the claim that e-cigarettes are “harmless to those around you,” there is still
much research needed to confirm this assertion. With the option of a nicotine vapor, ecigarettes
present a possible danger to users and those exposed, as nicotine can have
a negative effect on the heart and circulatory system."



As with all things in America... Guilty until proven innocent.




Caffeine also has nasty side effects, but I bet Starbucks isn't under the same proposal in Berserkley.

I hate getting the second hand caffeine jitters from inhaling the vapors from my co workers morning coffee. It should certainly be banned in public areas. Also sick of gaining weight from smelling the steam streaming off their lunches; its not fair that I should be unwillingly exposed. No more public meals or coffee in enclosed settings! :D
 

Jaguar07

Carpe Nocturne
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 30, 2013
268
497
Long Beach, California, USA
There's also an interesting bias that develops in the study if you read all of it.

At the beginning of the results this is stated

"During operation of the e-cigarette, the carrier substance of the ‘liquids’, 1,2-propanediol, was detected in the chamber atmosphere but the concentration was below the limit of determination"

Later, they decide that because they can "See" vapor, it has to be a measurable contaminant, and they devise a new way to look for it.
As shown here:
"Although 1,2-propanediol was detected in traces only in the 8-m³ chamber during the consumption of e-cigarettes, this compound must be released owing to the visible fume in the exhaled breath. To determine the VOC composition in the breath gas directly, an e-cigarette smoker exhaled into a 10-l glass chamber. The identified chemical species are shown in Figure 3. The experiment revealed a high amount of 1,2-propanediol in the exhaled air. Other main components were the carrier substance 1,2,3-propanetriol, the flavoring source diacetin as well as traces of apple oil (3-methylbutyl-3-methylbutanoate) and nicotine. The fact that these compounds were not detectable during the 8-m³ emission test chamber measurement is assumed to be caused by the short usage (6 min per ‘liquid’) and sink effects of the chamber for the very polar 1,2-propanediol."

In essence they are contradicting their own initial findings, and "rigging" the results, because they viewed "Visible Fume". Ergo if I see smoke, there must be a burning cigarette, syndrome.

One of my neighbors started coughing when they witnessed my vapor cloud. They were over 200 feet away and the air was calm. The mind is the most powerful thing. Hatred of cigarettes runs deep. Anything that appears like a cigarette that causes smoke, must be bad.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread