Best rebuildable atomizer for my bottom feed Reo Grand?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Conchord George

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 11, 2013
167
110
NH

Jazzi Mike

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 3, 2013
1,566
853
Michigan
I agree the Reomizer is top notch. On reosmods.com they also now stock a modified Igo-S to work with a Reo. I have not tried it yet, but I'm sure that if it is on the site, it is a top notch RDA as well.

Before I tried the RM2, I never realized how much vapor a device could put out, especially for a simple design. The ceramic deck keeps things cooler, even when chain vaping.
 

DasBluCig

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 30, 2013
1,450
3,584
Chichester, NH
I really want something nicer than the rm2 myself. Something not brass but stainless and well made. Any other ones out there? My reo lately is unused and unloved. And I have 2 rm2 atomizers already. Just not doing it for me anymore.
Have you tried Rob's IGO-S bf?? It's a small platform to build on.....but it works GREAT, and IS stainless....and less $$ than an RM2, FWIW....
Like others, though.....I lean toward the RM2 for my Reo Grand and Mini 2.1...for me, they're an integral part of the Reo...
Happy (vaping) Trails!
 

DasBluCig

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 30, 2013
1,450
3,584
Chichester, NH
Flavor wise, assuming you have close to the same build is there any differences between the igo bf and the RM2?

For me, the RM2 provides better juice delivery.....the feed/return hole is IN the base, and larger than the IGO-S (the -S has the feed/return hole drilled in one of the posts -- and it's tiny, compared to the RM2)....
I also have found the IGO-S seems more prone to flooding if you're not careful with your "squonk"!!:D
End of the day....BOTH RDAs provide good service on the Reo.....and, yes, I do use the same coil build on both -- 1.2 ohm single micro coil, 30ga. kanthal wound on a 3/64" mandrel, cotton wick/cloud combo....
Good luck!
Happy(vaping) Trails!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread