Bridged or Bridgless attys?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Optimo

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 16, 2011
1,894
787
39
Virginia
I find that removing the bridge makes it to where you have to drip more often and the height of the flavor dosen't last as long. I drip 99% of the time using IKV or Cisco 510 attys when I vape. I've debridged Ciscos and wish I didn't do it afterwards. It can cause juice to sputter out your drip tip into your mouth more often too. Just don't really see any kind of benefit to debridging imo.
 
Last edited:

AttyPops

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jul 8, 2010
8,708
134,332
Hc Svnt Dracones - USA EST
It may make a difference for some juices, since the darker ones in particular tend to gunk up atties... and de-bridging removes the little wicks that can get burnt juice collected on them. However, this is really a problem with over-heating/over-vaping the juice and not a bridge issue in and of itself (IMO).

I don't debridge mine. No need to. The bridge is there tho help hold (well, really wick) e-juice. May help cool the coil/juice too... IDK for sure.

As with all things e-cigs, YMMV. All you can do is try it and see if it's for you. Waste of time and possibly $$ IMO. But that's me.
 

tj99959

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
  • Aug 13, 2011
    15,116
    39,600
    utah
    To each their own, I debridge mine, but that's just me. I will also say that dewicking is more important than debridging (the wick that is under the bridge, not the one in the coil). It's just that it's easier to dewick when you debridge.
    The reason that I dewick/debridge is because IMHO it makes it easier to both change flavors and clean the atty. Better taste is not the reson for me.
     
    Last edited:
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users who are viewing this thread