It would be much easier and effective to monitor ejuice 'products' rather than to attempt to define and enforce a restrictive ejuice creation 'process.'
The powers that be are beginning to salivate at the thought of money coming to the table in the vaping realm.
Some may be working to limit the number of players at the table while attempting to sell consumer vapers lowered expectations for the future of eliquids.
Money and power in a fewer hands serves nicely by creating limitations and concentrating resources. Limitations drive up prices and concentrating resources simplifies the efforts of those who are more interested in wielding power and lining their own pockets rather than facilitating the best outcome for the vaping consumer.
Some supposedly working for the interests of vapers may actually be trying to sell us short for their own reward. While vapers might desire an open market in unrestricted eliquids, those in key positions may personally realize greater benefit from a highly restricted marketplace.
Answer this question for yourself: Would the supposed brokers of vapers' interests benefit more from a market largely free of onerous restrictions, or more from one which was controlled by entities that would limit the type and quality of products we are allowed to receive?
Do not follow the lead of, nor support those who would auction the interests of vaping to the highest bidder or a coalition of entities with a focus distinctly different than that of consumer vapers.
The powers that be are beginning to salivate at the thought of money coming to the table in the vaping realm.
Some may be working to limit the number of players at the table while attempting to sell consumer vapers lowered expectations for the future of eliquids.
Money and power in a fewer hands serves nicely by creating limitations and concentrating resources. Limitations drive up prices and concentrating resources simplifies the efforts of those who are more interested in wielding power and lining their own pockets rather than facilitating the best outcome for the vaping consumer.
Some supposedly working for the interests of vapers may actually be trying to sell us short for their own reward. While vapers might desire an open market in unrestricted eliquids, those in key positions may personally realize greater benefit from a highly restricted marketplace.
Answer this question for yourself: Would the supposed brokers of vapers' interests benefit more from a market largely free of onerous restrictions, or more from one which was controlled by entities that would limit the type and quality of products we are allowed to receive?
Do not follow the lead of, nor support those who would auction the interests of vaping to the highest bidder or a coalition of entities with a focus distinctly different than that of consumer vapers.
