Couldn't find the Nicotine Patch Club nor the Nicotine Gum Club :(

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've done the switch to vaping and I'm lovin' it. Can you hear the jingle?

Hmmmmmmm?

Could it be proven empirically that a single Big Mac contains more carcinogenic components than one year of vaping? Is the Big Mac more deadly than vaping?

Things that make you go, "hmmmmm??" Just like the absence of the Nicotine Patch Club or the Nicotine Gum Club.

Is there going to be the Nicotine Inhaler Club or the Nicotine breath freshener Club? I'd wager anything that if it ever came to existence, we would have no recourse but to advise them of their inability to function intelligently and direct them to the nearest mental health institution for immediate neurological high voltage shock therapy.

What are the pharmaceutical Goliaths going to to come up with next? Maybe go the idiotic route and take the benign but addictive nicotine out of the deadly carcinogenic tobacco and shove this deadly product among smokers? Now that would be an absolutely stupid idea, eh? (oh yea, I'm Canadian. Vancouver B.C.)

Well, guess what? That is exactly what is happening this summer! The pharmaceutical corporations have announced their new smoking cessation product. The X-22... Yes, that right. X-22... (X-22 | 22nd Century Group, Inc.)

This is why the big wigs at the pharmaceutical corporations are active in influencing the heart, lung and cancer foundations, (who enjoy the direct funding from the pharmaceutical establishments) to condemn the e-cig phenomenon that is taking the world by storm. How many billions of dollars has these pharmaceutical monsters invested into X-22?

This is insane.

Are they going to get necessary approval by FDA and Health Canada over its direct competitor e-cigs? (which is harmless by comparison) Have they not considered that, while undergoing combustion, the X-22 is LOADED with carcinogenic materials making them hundreds of times deadlier than e-cigs?

Why are the pharmaceutical companies so focused upon removing the desirable aspects of smoking? Smoking cessation products are a complete failure since they removed the pleasurable aspects of smoking.

Why can't the governments understand that e-cigs has the real potential of saving the lives of hundreds of millions that will otherwise die by cigarettes? If e-cigs become common place, why would anyone want to remain smoking cigarettes? If e-cigs become common place, people could continue vaping nicotine for the rest of their lives without the stigma that cigarettes have. Many would stop altogether, but that's not important. The majority would switch... It's cheaper, better tasting, healthier and just as much fun as cigarettes. Vaping has become a hobby, which we enjoy.

Is it so difficult for governments to get their heads around the fact that we enjoy the nicotine we get from our e-cigs since it nearly replicates the habitual aspects and the addictive inhalation and exhalation of smoke/vapor of the cigarette perfectly?

Stop with the Nicotine Cessation Project, since its a failure. Start with Cigarette Cessation. E-cigs have the ability to save more lives than any other device ever invented.

Vaping works.

Love your site.
 

JmeMcG

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 1, 2012
193
173
57
Clackamas, Oregon
What the....???? Wow. That's about all I can say. Good to see they are going to "fast track" these new, wonderful, FDA approved CIGARETTES, so they can get them in the hands of "smokers who refuse to quit" :facepalm: Wonder what the cost per pack for these prescription cigarettes is going to be and if they will be covered by insurance?


Oh and back when I was a smoker, I considered the ultra slim, ultra ultra light cigs as VLN cigarettes. Just saying, I think this "product" already exists.
 

juicejunky

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jan 22, 2011
3,745
2,799
gone
What the....???? Wow. That's about all I can say. Good to see they are going to "fast track" these new, wonderful, FDA approved CIGARETTES, so they can get them in the hands of "smokers who refuse to quit" :facepalm: Wonder what the cost per pack for these prescription cigarettes is going to be and if they will be covered by insurance?


Oh and back when I was a smoker, I considered the ultra slim, ultra ultra light cigs as VLN cigarettes. Just saying, I think this "product" already exists.

Wasn't the result of the lights that people just smoked more of them? Works out quite well for them.

Fail
 

JmeMcG

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 1, 2012
193
173
57
Clackamas, Oregon
Wasn't the result of the lights that people just smoked more of them? Works out quite well for them.

Fail

Yeah, that was mostly sarcasm. I never was a slim, ultra light smoker anyway. Granted, I tried one or two over the years... never could understand what the point was...
 
When science is ignored in favor for something that is deadlier on the public than e-cigarettes, one has to understand the motives that drive this type of ideology.

Greed.

Big Pharma doesn't care for the safety and well-being of the public. The sicker the public gets, the more money Big Pharma gets. Its a Juggernaut of power and influence.

When people die of cigarettes, its big money for them. This is the reason why their products are designed specifically to be as unattractive to the smoker as possible. They know the abysmal rate of success for their products indirectly supports the tobacco companies as well.

E-cigarettes have the ability to destroy their useless work.
 

DCB305

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 26, 2012
244
89
Florida
Put it this way, there is no money in cures therefore no incentive for companies to develop them. On the other side of that pancake there is substantial revenue to be gained/generated in developing/offering treatments. In a world where the bottom is line is more important than saving lives this is what we get. I bet you if pharmaceutical companies developed e-cig's and made it a medical device and the only way to get the juice was through a prescription FDA would have approved it a long time ago.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread