Hello, I made a visit to one of my local B&Ms to pick up another clearomizer for my vv v3.0. I was going to pick up another I clear 16B, but the owner suggested that the Aspire BDC ET-S was better. I have been using these two brands going on a couple weeks now and to be honest I don't think there has been any great difference in taste or performance with these two brands or models. I have been using these tanks set on 8 watts and both brands seem to be producing a satisfying vape for my taste. I know locally that the 16B is a few dollars cheaper then the Aspire, but it does make me wonder if there is that great of differences between allot of these stock clearomizers.
different clearomizers
- Thread starter chipd
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
Most of the difference in these devices is personal preference and placebo effect. New tanks always taste a little better and of course it's always better for salesmen if you constantly try newer and more expensive tanks. My Iclear 30 still has had the same coil and wick for two months. It still has good flavor and vapor.
When you can determine that you'll know if you want a better tank or not.
When you can determine that you'll know if you want a better tank or not.
Most of the difference in these devices is personal preference and placebo effect. New tanks always taste a little better and of course it's always better for salesmen if you constantly try newer and more expensive tanks. My Iclear 30 still has had the same coil and wick for two months. It still has good flavor and vapor.
When you can determine that you'll know if you want a better tank or not.
I still have the same wicks in all three of my toppers and Wednesday will be two weeks for the 16Bs and a few days less for the aspire. They all are reading proper ohms as well.
I have a aerotank and a fogger v4. I use the aerotank as my daily use and the fogger on those hard to get through times which are getting less and less the longer I go. I will admit the flavor and vape from the fogger is quite amazing and different that my aerotank but Its actually a little to much for my personal liking. I say if your current tank is satisfying your needs no since in changing.
Ive only bought 2 tank upgrades and 1 mod upgrade since I started vaping. Hopefully I wont have to keep upgrading like some people do in order to stay satisfied.
Ive only bought 2 tank upgrades and 1 mod upgrade since I started vaping. Hopefully I wont have to keep upgrading like some people do in order to stay satisfied.
I've read posts where people have to change coils/wicks every day. My old i30 looks better all the time.
It is a horse apiece. Some will swear by one some will swear by others. The aspire bdc for me are not as good when I crank up the watts. Have you thought about getting a areotank v2? The adjustable air flow does help
Get yourself Aerotank Mini or EVOD Glass and install a new version of coil in it. Other clearos are useless.
I know what you mean about upgrading. As a new guy you can't help wondering if you are getting the best vape from your juice. With this being said I can say that between the Aspire and the 16bs I don't feel there is very much or any difference. Of course this is just my opinion YMMV.
I like the Aspire glass models because I use lots of "tank-cracker" flavors and I find them to be better than the Kangers I had tried. They have fewer parts and you never do an 'oopsie' when refilling (it's from the bottom). Plus pretty colors!
I have a 16b and it seems like my kangertec t3s or whatever it is hits better.. not to mention both started giving a odd taste and the 16b just died on me yesterday and the kangers still pulling strong
In my experience, the only things that vary are materials (Pyrex vs plastic), airflow, single or dual coil, and longevity of the clearo before it starts to leak or something.
Well the odd taste I'm experiencing probably means I've burnt the wick material slightly on my kanger.. and the 16b the wicks burnt ouch much faster and the coil went
IMHO, clearomizers are all about the same. They are a very simple design meant for novice vapors or intermediate vapers who want the convenience of easy fill/easy replacement coil changes. They can be very inconsistant (dry or burnt hits, flooding, gurgling, juice in the mouth or leaking on the battery) and often mute flavors. Hard to expect a tiny silica wick to carry enough e-liquid to the coil consistantly, and for the tiny coils to vaporize all of the e-liquid. A longer gentler draw technique works better than a short hard draw.
You'll get better performance and consistancy the higher up the chain of juice attachments you try. In return, they may require more setup time or have a higher learning curve to get better flavor and vapor.
Guide to Juice Attachments
You'll get better performance and consistancy the higher up the chain of juice attachments you try. In return, they may require more setup time or have a higher learning curve to get better flavor and vapor.
Guide to Juice Attachments
Last edited:
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked
