& is there any advantage UFS has over iAtty?
Yes
1/ Controls - rate of juice flow, air flow
2/ A window
3/ Less hassle and fiddling
4/ A native fit on the GGTS
The UFS isn't going to be obsolete anytime soon. It's still one of the best tank systems and works really well if you figure it out. When the UFS came out people were...well people are still using AVS's and enjoying them a bunch. Old to new GG products from tanks to pv's are never going to be obsolete.
Got to honest i'd probably advise them to get an Iatty.
I love my UFS and im back on it now (as i have to calm down a bit).
But apart from that the iatty is much more user friendly and as for the looks department.
Well........
If this was all stainless...
Agree with this statement as a product that is in use by the user will never become obsolete to them, but here is the question i would like to see some input on, of course it would be ideal if you could give honest input after you have received and really put your iAtty's through their paces.
To the question...if a new user to the GG range wanted advice on a tank system, which would you advise?
i realized after i posted this that my choice of a word like "obsolete" might provoke strong reactions from UFS users who have not yet explored iAtty.. Of course UFS will continue to prized and desired and used. But I seek the opinions of those who have used both...
womblebat, thank you for sharing your understanding of what i meant![]()
I think the UFS has the iAtty beat in the looks department. The iAtty can match the performance of the UFS and maybe with a SS mouthpiece could be on par with appearance.