E- Cigarette Controversy Lights Up

Status
Not open for further replies.

Krakkan

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Feb 22, 2009
855
4
New Orleans, LA
www.truesmoker.com
Submitted by Kathleen Blanchard RN on May 9th, 2009
Posted under:

While the impetus behind e-cigarette (electronic cigarette) use stems from a desire to help people stop smoking, while respecting smoking bans, it seems that e cigarette controversy lights up because electronic cigarettes are not approved by any governing body – specifically the FDA. The result is that electronic cigarette import has been banned, and the makers are in China. Currently, the FDA has no control over cigarettes.
The maker of e-cigarettes claims inhaling nicotine vapor minus the tobacco is a sincere effort to provide an alternative to smoking. Electronic cigarettes may be poisonous, another part of the controversy. No one knows. Allegedly, the ingredients, water, propylene glycol, liquid nicotine, only if desired, and a “tobacco scent”, have been tested for toxicity, but no long term studies tell us about safety. In the meantime, affiliate marketers are rushing to enjoy the potential profits.
One e-cigarette importer is suing the FDA. With the recent decline in trust toward the FDA, many supporters of electronic cigarettes insist they are a great product, and the controversy is political. The tobacco industry is threatened, as are makers of pharmaceuticals for smoking cessation. Each ingredient has been tested for safety by the FDA, including propylene glycol.
E-cigarettes are the same size as a regular cigarette, but do not feel as light when held. Manufacturing of electronic cigarettes varies slightly, but the idea is a that the ingredients are contained within a cartridge with a mouthpiece.
Kate Rogers, state director for the American Cancer Society says, “There is no strong evidence that shows they improve one’s chances of quitting,” but consumers who have used e-cigarettes contend they definitely help, improving their chances of smoking cessation. Given the fact that tobacco contains a multitude of chemicals other than tobacco, electronic cigarettes seem great to most consumers who have lost trust in any organization enmeshed in big business.
E-cigarettes may offer a great option for smokers concerned about the long-term health effects of smoking chemical laden tobacco. Most smokers want to quit, but viable alternative fail many. You might think that given the burden on healthcare spending, and the individual health consequences associated with cigarettes, that someone would launch a study to put the e-cigarette controversy to rest – if electronic cigarettes can improve health by helping with tobacco addiction, making them readily available would be nothing short of good.
You can find a list of unapproved e-cigarette manufacturers at the at FDA.


E- Cigarette Controversy Lights Up, Quit Smoking Support
 

SharonLM

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Another thing I haven't seen mentioned a lot is the fact that there is NO second-hand smoke with our e-cigs. Surely that should mean a lot to many anti-smoker people.

Also, has anyone ever used the lozenges? They burn the side of your mouth like heck. I wouldn't think prolonged use of those would be healthy. My husband works with a girl that's been using them for 4 years.

Good article! Thanks!
 

MlrGrl

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 27, 2009
1,326
54
Milwaukee, WI
The one that worries me is the shipment of "blank cartridges".

I didn't read through that list, but growing up, a 'cartridge' was something use in reloading firearms.....

Is there maybe a different word they should use to make it thought customs easier? Something like "noiseless whistles" ....??? (well, the 901's look like they could have a been a whistle)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread